Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27858177›Full record

ArticleClinical rheumatology2017

Age of onset influences on clinical and laboratory profile of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Rafael Hennemann Sassi, Jordana Vaz Hendler, Giovana Fagundes Piccoli, Andrese Aline Gasparin, Rafael Mendonça da Silva Chakr, João Carlos Tavares Brenol, Odirlei André Monticielo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. New Insights on Childhood Lupus Nephritis.International journal of nephrology and renovascular disease · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rafael Hennemann SassiDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul UFRGS, Rua Ramiro Barcelos, 2350, 645, Porto Alegre, 90035-003, Brazil.
Jordana Vaz HendlerDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul UFRGS, Rua Ramiro Barcelos, 2350, 645, Porto Alegre, 90035-003, Brazil.
Giovana Fagundes PiccoliDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul UFRGS, Rua Ramiro Barcelos, 2350, 645, Porto Alegre, 90035-003, Brazil.
Andrese Aline GasparinDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul UFRGS, Rua Ramiro Barcelos, 2350, 645, Porto Alegre, 90035-003, Brazil.
Rafael Mendonça da Silva ChakrDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul UFRGS, Rua Ramiro Barcelos, 2350, 645, Porto Alegre, 90035-003, Brazil.
João Carlos Tavares BrenolDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul UFRGS, Rua Ramiro Barcelos, 2350, 645, Porto Alegre, 90035-003, Brazil.
Odirlei André MonticieloDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul UFRGS, Rua Ramiro Barcelos, 2350, 645, Porto Alegre, 90035-003, Brazil. omonticielo@yahoo.com.br.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study aims to evaluate differences in clinical and laboratory manifestations and medication use in the different ages of disease onset in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). This cross-sectional study consisted of 598 SLE patients (550 female and 48 male), who attended the Rheumatology Clinic of the Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre between 2003 and 2015. Demographic, clinical and laboratory data were collected. The patients were classified into three groups according to their ages at disease diagnosis. Mean age of diagnosis was 33.6 ± 14.3 years, and the median (25th-75th percentile) disease duration was 13 (7-20) years. Among the patients studied, 419 (70%) were adult-onset (aSLE), 90 (14.8%) were late-onset (lSLE) and 89 (14.8%) were childhood-onset (cSLE). The female to male ratio was higher in aSLE (18:1) compared to the other groups (p = 0.001). Arthritis was predominantly found in aSLE (78.5%) when compared with lSLE (57.7%) (p < 0.001). Nephritis was more common in cSLE (60.6%) than in lSLE (26.6%) (p < 0.001). Median (25th-75th percentile) of SLE disease activity index (SLEDAI) was higher in the cSLE group [2 (0-5)] when compared to the lSLE group [0 (0-4)] (p = 0.045). Childhood-onset SLE showed a more severe disease due to the higher incidence of nephritis and needed a more aggressive treatment with immunosuppressive drugs.

Indexed as

Age of OnsetAdolescentAdultAntirheumatic AgentsChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsIncidenceLupus Erythematosus, SystemicMaleMiddle AgedNephritisPrevalenceYoung AdultAntirheumatic AgentsImmunosuppressive AgentsAdult-onsetChildhood-onsetLate-onsetSystemic lupus erythematosus

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.