Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27858128›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2017

Investigating three types of continuous auditory feedback in visuo-manual tracking.

Éric O Boyer, Frédéric Bevilacqua, Patrick Susini, Sylvain Hanneton

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A review of concurrent sonified biofeedback in balance and gait training.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Modulation of ellipses drawing by sonification.Experimental brain research · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Éric O BoyerIrcam - STMS CNRS UPMC, 1 place Igor Stravinsky, 75004, Paris, France. eric.olivier.boyer@gmail.com.
Frédéric BevilacquaIrcam - STMS CNRS UPMC, 1 place Igor Stravinsky, 75004, Paris, France.
Patrick SusiniIrcam - STMS CNRS UPMC, 1 place Igor Stravinsky, 75004, Paris, France.
Sylvain HannetonLaboratoire de Psychologie de la Perception UMR CNRS 8242, Université Paris Descartes, 45 rue des Saints Pères, 75006, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of continuous auditory feedback for motor control and learning is still understudied and deserves more attention regarding fundamental mechanisms and applications. This paper presents the results of three experiments studying the contribution of task-, error-, and user-related sonification to visuo-manual tracking and assessing its benefits on sensorimotor learning. First results show that sonification can help decreasing the tracking error, as well as increasing the energy in participant's movement. In the second experiment, when alternating feedback presence, the user-related sonification did not show feedback dependency effects, contrary to the error and task-related feedback. In the third experiment, a reduced exposure of 50% diminished the positive effect of sonification on performance, whereas the increase of the average energy with sound was still significant. In a retention test performed on the next day without auditory feedback, movement energy was still superior for the groups previously trained with the feedback. Although performance was not affected by sound, a learning effect was measurable in both sessions and the user-related group improved its performance also in the retention test. These results confirm that a continuous auditory feedback can be beneficial for movement training and also show an interesting effect of sonification on movement energy. User-related sonification can prevent feedback dependency and increase retention. Consequently, sonification of the user's own motion appears as a promising solution to support movement learning with interactive feedback.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAdolescentAdultAgedAnalysis of VarianceAuditory PerceptionFeedback, SensoryFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMovementPhotic StimulationPsychomotor PerformanceReaction TimeYoung AdultAuditory feedbackInteractionSensorimotor learningSoundTracking

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.