Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27858115›Full record

GuidelineHerz2016

[The new ESC Guidelines for acute and chronic heart failure 2016].

C U Oeing, C Tschöpe, B Pieske

Abstract readPractice GuidelineReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Guideline in Herz, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Elevated filling pressures are associated with poor long-term graft survival after pediatric heart transplantation.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Ventricular phase analysis moves on to the next phase: What technologists should keep in mind.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. [Application of cardiac assist device and its biomechanics research for heart failure].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

C U OeingDepartment of Cardiology, Charité-University-Medicine Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum (CVK), Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland.
C TschöpeDepartment of Cardiology, Charité-University-Medicine Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum (CVK), Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland.
B PieskeDepartment of Cardiology, Charité-University-Medicine Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum (CVK), Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland. burkert.pieske@charite.de.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEDeutsches Herzzentrum der Charité · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The new guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure (HF) were presented in May 2016 during the congress of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) in Florence. An important amendment affects the classification of HF which now differentiates between HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and left ventricular EF (LVEF) > 50%, HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF, LVEF < 40%) and the new entity HF with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF, LVEF 40-49%). Additionally, there are revised algorithms for the diagnosis and treatment for acute and chronic HF. The algorithm for the diagnosis of acute HF is based on the clinical presentation and from this prognosis and treatment options can be derived. The algorithm for the diagnosis of chronic HF is now based on the probability for HF in a 3-step model comprised of clinical presentation, patient history and electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities, together with increased plasma levels of N‑terminal propeptide brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP, normal <125 pg/ml) and BNP (normal <35 pg/ml). Echocardiographic assessment is essential to confirm the diagnosis and obtain further differentiation. Essential updates to medicinal therapy include the introduction of a novel drug class of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI, sacubitril/valsartan) as a class I/B indication in the HFrEF treatment recommendations according to the PARADIGM-HF trial data. Additionally, due to the EMPA-REG trial the sodium-dependent glucose transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor empagliflozin has been recommended in the new guidelines for the prevention of symptomatic HF in high-risk patients (class IIa/B indication). For cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) a novel class I/A indication for QRS > 150 ms and left bundle branch block (LBBB), a class I/B indication for QRS > 130 ms and LBBB as well as high-grade atrioventricular block with pacemaker indications have been put forward. The Life Vest® for bridging therapy of high-risk patients received a class IIb/C indication. In this article we summarize the major novelties of the ESC guidelines 2016 and shed light on the underlying innovations and clinical trials.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseCardiologyChronic DiseaseDiagnostic Techniques, CardiovascularEuropeEvidence-Based MedicineGuideline AdherenceHeart FailureHumansAcute heart failureChronic heart failureDiagnosticsESC guidelinesTherapy

Identifiers

PMID27858115
OpenAlexW2555210615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.