Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27858113›Full record

ArticleArchives of toxicology2017

A framework for the use of single-chemical transcriptomics data in predicting the hazards associated with complex mixtures of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.

Sarah Labib, Andrew Williams, Byron Kuo, Carole L Yauk, Paul A White, Sabina Halappanavar

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of toxicology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Classifying polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by carcinogenic potency using in vitro biosignatures.Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah LabibEnvironmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Health Canada, Ottawa, ON, K1A 0K9, Canada.
Andrew WilliamsEnvironmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Health Canada, Ottawa, ON, K1A 0K9, Canada.
Byron KuoEnvironmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Health Canada, Ottawa, ON, K1A 0K9, Canada.
Carole L YaukEnvironmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Health Canada, Ottawa, ON, K1A 0K9, Canada.
Paul A WhiteEnvironmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Health Canada, Ottawa, ON, K1A 0K9, Canada.
Sabina HalappanavarEnvironmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Health Canada, Ottawa, ON, K1A 0K9, Canada. sabina.halappanavar@hc-sc.gc.ca.
Health Canada · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The assumption of additivity applied in the risk assessment of environmental mixtures containing carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) was investigated using transcriptomics. MutaTMMouse were gavaged for 28 days with three doses of eight individual PAHs, two defined mixtures of PAHs, or coal tar, an environmentally ubiquitous complex mixture of PAHs. Microarrays were used to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in lung tissue collected 3 days post-exposure. Cancer-related pathways perturbed by the individual or mixtures of PAHs were identified, and dose-response modeling of the DEGs was conducted to calculate gene/pathway benchmark doses (BMDs). Individual PAH-induced pathway perturbations (the median gene expression changes for all genes in a pathway relative to controls) and pathway BMDs were applied to models of additivity [i.e., concentration addition (CA), generalized concentration addition (GCA), and independent action (IA)] to generate predicted pathway-specific dose-response curves for each PAH mixture. The predicted and observed pathway dose-response curves were compared to assess the sensitivity of different additivity models. Transcriptomics-based additivity calculation showed that IA accurately predicted the pathway perturbations induced by all mixtures of PAHs. CA did not support the additivity assumption for the defined mixtures; however, GCA improved the CA predictions. Moreover, pathway BMDs derived for coal tar were comparable to BMDs derived from previously published coal tar-induced mouse lung tumor incidence data. These results suggest that in the absence of tumor incidence data, individual chemical-induced transcriptomics changes associated with cancer can be used to investigate the assumption of additivity and to predict the carcinogenic potential of a mixture.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsComplex MixturesGene Expression ProfilingLungLung NeoplasmsMaleMice, TransgenicNeoplasmsPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsComplex MixturesPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsAdditivityComplex mixturesPolycyclic aromatic hydrocarbonsToxicogenomicsTranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID27858113
PMCPMC5489644
OpenAlexW2555607948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.