ArticleDental research journal2016
A histologic, histomorphometric, and radiographic comparison between two complexes of CenoBoen/CenoMembrane and Bio-Oss/Bio-Gide in lateral ridge augmentation: A clinical trial.
Article in Dental research journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Horizontal ridge augmentation using xenogenous bone graft-systematic review.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2019Pooled it
- A Histologic, Histomorphometric, and Immunohistochemical Evaluation of Anorganic Bovine Bone and Injectable Biphasic Calcium Phosphate in Humans: A Randomized Clinical Trial.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Trial
- [Application of β-TCP for bone defect restore after the mandibular third molars extraction: A splitmouth clinical trial].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2020Trial
- Potentials of pure xenograft materials in maxillary ridge augmentation: A case series.The Saudi dental journal · 2024Article
- Influence of melatonin associated with the Bio-Gide® membrane on osteoblast activity: an in vitro Study.Acta odontologica latinoamericana : AOL · 2022Article
- [Biodegradation properties of multi-laminated small intestinal submucosa].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2020Article
- Experiment of GBR for repair of peri-implant alveolar defects in beagle dogs.Scientific reports · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSeveral grafting materials have been used for alveolar ridge augmentation. The literature lacks researches to compare CenoBone to other grafting materials. The aim of this study was to compare CenoBone/CenoMembrane complex to Bio-Oss/Bio-Gide complex in lateral alveolar bone augmentation in terms of radiographic, histologic, and histomorphometric parameters. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this randomized controlled trial, ten patients who needed lateral ridge augmentation were selected and augmentations were done using either of CenoBone/CenoMembrane or Bio-Oss/Bio-Gide complexes. In the re-entry surgery in 6 months following augmentation, core biopsies were taken and clinical, radiographic, histologic, and histomorphometric evaluations were performed.
resultsNo statistically significant difference was seen between groups except for the number of blood vessels and percentage of residual graft materials.
conclusionCenoBone seems to present a comparable lateral ridge augmentation to Bio-Oss in.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.