ArticleNeural regeneration research2016
Concepts and opportunities for repair in cerebral microvascular disease and white matter stroke.
Article in Neural regeneration research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advancing clinical trial readiness in white matter disease and related dementias: key steps for future research progress.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Electroacupuncture Inhibits Myelin Sheath Injury in the Internal Capsule After Focal Cerebral Infarction in Rats Through the Nogo-A/NgR Signaling Pathway.Medical science monitor basic research · 2021Article
- Translating concepts of neural repair after stroke: Structural and functional targets for recovery.Restorative neurology and neuroscience · 2020Review
- Pathophysiology of Lacunar Stroke: History's Mysteries and Modern Interpretations.Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association · 2019Review
- Treatment Approaches to Lacunar Stroke.Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.