Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27857224›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Postnatal auditory preferences in piglets differ according to maternal emotional experience with the same sounds during gestation.

Céline Tallet, Marine Rakotomahandry, Carole Guérin, Alban Lemasson, Martine Hausberger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Emotion Recognition in Cats.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Céline TalletI.N.R.A., U.M.R.1348 PEGASE, Saint-Gilles, France.
Marine RakotomahandryI.N.R.A., U.M.R.1348 PEGASE, Saint-Gilles, France.
Carole GuérinI.N.R.A., U.M.R.1348 PEGASE, Saint-Gilles, France.
Alban LemassonUniversité de Rennes 1, Laboratoire d'éthologie animale et humaine, U.M.R. 6552- C.N.R.S., Paimpont, France.
Martine HausbergerC.N.R.S., Laboratoire d'éthologie animale et humaine, U.M.R. 6552- Université de Rennes 1, Rennes, France.
Ethologie animale et humaineInstitut Agro Rennes-Angers · FRPhysiologie Environnement et Génétique pour l'Animal et les Systèmes d'Elevage · FRUniversité de Rennes · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prenatal sensory experience, notably auditory experience, is a source of fetal memories in many species. The contiguity between sensory stimuli and maternal emotional reactions provides opportunity for associative learning in utero but no clear evidence for this associative learning has been presented to date. Understanding this phenomenon would advance our knowledge of fetal sensory learning capacities. In the present study we tested the hypothesis that sounds (human voice) broadcast to pregnant sows while they experienced positive or negative emotional situations influences postnatal reactions of their offspring to these same sounds. The results show that: 1) from the first testing at the age of 2 days, the experimental piglets were less distressed by a social separation than controls if they heard the "familiar" voice, 2) piglets generalized to any human voice although the influence of novel voices was less pronounced, 3) in a challenging situation, piglets were more distressed if they heard the voice that was associated with maternal negative emotional state in utero. These findings open a whole line of new research on the long term effect of in utero associative learning that goes well beyond pigs, providing a framework for reconsidering the importance of sensory and emotional experiences during gestation.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionEmotionsMaternal ExposurePrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsAnimalsFemaleHumansMalePregnancySwine

Identifiers

PMID27857224
PMCPMC5114567
OpenAlexW2552753337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.