Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27857175›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2016

Elevated Mitochondrial DNA Copy Number in Peripheral Blood and Tissue Predict the Opposite Outcome of Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Nan Chen, Shu Wen, Xiaoru Sun, Qian Fang, Lin Huang, Shuai Liu, Wanling Li, Meng Qiu

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Association Between Mitochondrial DNA Copy Number and Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nan ChenWest China School of Medicine/West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Shu WenWest China School of Medicine/West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Xiaoru SunWest China School of Medicine/West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Qian FangWest China School of Medicine/West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Lin HuangWest China School of Medicine/West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Shuai LiuWest China School of Medicine/West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Wanling LiWest China School of Medicine/West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Meng QiuWest China School of Medicine/West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Sichuan University · CNWest China Hospital of Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies have suggested that mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) copy number was associated with cancer risk. However, no solid conclusion revealed the potential predictive value of mtDNA copy number for cancer prognosis. The present meta-analysis was performed to clarify the problem. Hence, we performed a systematic search in PubMed, EmBase, Web of Science databases independently and a total of eighteen studies comprising 3961 cases satisfied the criteria and finally enrolled. Our results didn't show the association between them but significant heterogeneity in overall analysis (OS: HR = 0.923, 95% CI: 0.653-1.306, p = 0.652; DFS: HR = 0.997, 95% CI: 0.599-1.659, p = 0.99). However, subgroup analysis stratified by sample came to the opposite conclusion. High level mitochondrial DNA copy number in peripheral blood predicted a poor cancer prognosis (OS: HR = 1.624, 95% CI: 1.211-2.177, p = 0.001; DFS: HR = 1.582, 95% CI: 1.026-2.439, p = 0.038) while patients with high level mitochondrial DNA copy number in tumor tissue exhibited better outcomes (OS: HR = 0.604 95% CI: 0.406-0.899, p = 0.013; DFS: HR = 0.593, 95% CI: 0.411-0.857, p = 0.005). These findings were further proved in detailed analyses in blood or tissue subgroup. In conclusion, our study suggested the elevated mtDNA copy number in peripheral blood predicted a poor cancer prognosis while the better outcome was presented among patients with elevated mtDNA copy number in tumor tissue.

Indexed as

PrognosisDisease-Free SurvivalDNA, MitochondrialHumansNeoplasmsRisk FactorsDNA, Mitochondrial

Identifiers

PMID27857175
PMCPMC5114650
OpenAlexW2554261864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.