ArticleScientific reports2016
Mobile phone signal exposure triggers a hormesis-like effect in Atm
Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prenatal Exposure to 3.5 GHz Radiofrequency Radiation and Long-Term Skin Histomorphometry: An 18-Month Experimental Rat Study.Medeniyet medical journal · 2025Article
- A scoping review and evidence map of radiofrequency field exposure and genotoxicity: assessingFrontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Effects of 5G-modulated 3.5 GHz radiofrequency field exposures on HSF1, RAS, ERK, and PML activation in live fibroblasts and keratinocytes cells.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- New View on the Impact of the Low-Frequency Electromagnetic Field (50 Hz) on Stress Responses: Hormesis Effect.Neuroendocrinology · 2023Article
- Article
- Hybrid Reduced Graphene Oxide with Special Magnetoresistance for Wireless Magnetic Field Sensor.Nano-micro letters · 2020Article
- 5G Technology: Why Should We Expect a shift from RF-Induced Brain Cancers to Skin Cancers?Journal of biomedical physics & engineering · 2019Article
- Two decades (1998-2018) of research Progress on Hormesis: advancing biological understanding and enabling novel applications.Journal of cell communication and signaling · 2019Article
- The effects of 50 Hz magnetic field-exposed cell culture medium on cellular functions in FL cells.Journal of radiation research · 2019Article
- Fibroblasts from patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis are resistant to cisplatin-induced cell death via enhanced CK2-dependent XRCC1 activity.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2019Article
- Studies on effects of static electric field exposure on liver in mice.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Effects of Single and Repeated Exposure to a 50-Hz 2-mT Electromagnetic Field on Primary Cultured Hippocampal Neurons.Neuroscience bulletin · 2017Article
- The various aspects of genetic and epigenetic toxicology: testing methods and clinical applications.Journal of translational medicine · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMFs) have been classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer as possible carcinogens to humans; however, this conclusion is based on limited epidemiological findings and lacks solid support from experimental studies. In particular, there are no consistent data regarding the genotoxicity of RF-EMFs. Ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) is recognised as a chief guardian of genomic stability. To address the debate on whether RF-EMFs are genotoxic, we compared the effects of 1,800 MHz RF-EMF exposure on genomic DNA in mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) with proficient (Atm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.