Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27856765›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016

Topic modeling for untargeted substructure exploration in metabolomics.

Justin Johan Jozias van der Hooft, Joe Wandy, Michael P Barrett, Karl E V Burgess, Simon Rogers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 176 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
176citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

176 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Bioactivity-guided metabolomics reveals discriminant cytotoxic signatures in Siparuna guianensis.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

116 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Justin Johan Jozias van der HooftGlasgow Polyomics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G61 1QH, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9340-5511
Joe WandyGlasgow Polyomics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G61 1QH, United Kingdom.
Michael P BarrettGlasgow Polyomics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G61 1QH, United Kingdom.
Karl E V BurgessGlasgow Polyomics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G61 1QH, United Kingdom.
Simon RogersGlasgow Polyomics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G61 1QH, United Kingdom; Simon.Rogers@glasgow.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-3578-4477

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I004599/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L018616/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 104111/Z/14/ZWellcome Trust 105614/Z/14/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The potential of untargeted metabolomics to answer important questions across the life sciences is hindered because of a paucity of computational tools that enable extraction of key biochemically relevant information. Available tools focus on using mass spectrometry fragmentation spectra to identify molecules whose behavior suggests they are relevant to the system under study. Unfortunately, fragmentation spectra cannot identify molecules in isolation but require authentic standards or databases of known fragmented molecules. Fragmentation spectra are, however, replete with information pertaining to the biochemical processes present, much of which is currently neglected. Here, we present an analytical workflow that exploits all fragmentation data from a given experiment to extract biochemically relevant features in an unsupervised manner. We demonstrate that an algorithm originally used for text mining, latent Dirichlet allocation, can be adapted to handle metabolomics datasets. Our approach extracts biochemically relevant molecular substructures ("Mass2Motifs") from spectra as sets of co-occurring molecular fragments and neutral losses. The analysis allows us to isolate molecular substructures, whose presence allows molecules to be grouped based on shared substructures regardless of classical spectral similarity. These substructures, in turn, support putative de novo structural annotation of molecules. Combining this spectral connectivity to orthogonal correlations (e.g., common abundance changes under system perturbation) significantly enhances our ability to provide mechanistic explanations for biological behavior.

Indexed as

WorkflowAlgorithmsDatabases, FactualMetabolomicsTandem Mass Spectrometrybioinformaticsfragmentationmass spectrometrymetabolomicstopic modeling

Identifiers

PMID27856765
PMCPMC5137707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.