Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27856755›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016

Controlling DNA-nanoparticle serum interactions.

Kyryl Zagorovsky, Leo Y T Chou, Warren C W Chan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Nucleic acid nanostructures forApplied physics reviews · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. ACS omega · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. [Tetrahedral Framework Nucleic Acids and Human Health].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kyryl ZagorovskyInstitute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 3G9.
Leo Y T ChouInstitute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 3G9.
Warren C W ChanInstitute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 3G9; warren.chan@utoronto.ca.

Funding

CIHR GCS105653-1CIHR MOP 130143
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the interaction of molecularly assembled nanoparticles with physiological fluids is critical to their use for in vivo delivery of drugs and contrast agents. Here, we systematically investigated the factors and mechanisms that govern the degradation of DNA on the nanoparticle surface in serum. We discovered that a higher DNA density, shorter oligonucleotides, and thicker PEG layer increased protection of DNA against serum degradation. Oligonucleotides on the surface of nanoparticles were highly resistant to DNase I endonucleases, and degradation was carried out exclusively by protein-mediated exonuclease cleavage and full-strand desorption. These results enabled the programming of the degradation rates of the DNA-assembled nanoparticle system from 0.1 to 0.7 h

Indexed as

Deoxyribonuclease IDNADNA CleavageDrug Delivery SystemsHumansNanoparticlesNanostructuresOligonucleotidesPolyethylene GlycolsSerumDeoxyribonuclease IDNAOligonucleotidesPolyethylene Glycolscontrolled cargo releaseDNA nanostructuresnanoparticle assemblyserum resistanceserum stability

Identifiers

PMID27856755
PMCPMC5137734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.