Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27856703›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2016

HIV-1 drug resistance mutations emerging on darunavir therapy in PI-naive and -experienced patients in the UK.

Kate El Bouzidi, Ellen White, Jean L Mbisa, Caroline A Sabin, Andrew N Phillips, Nicola Mackie, Anton L Pozniak, Anna Tostevin, Deenan Pillay, David T Dunn and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Next generation sequencing of HIV-1 protease in the PIVOT trial of protease inhibitor monotherapy.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2018
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Sanger and Next Generation Sequencing Approaches to Evaluate HIV-1 Virus in Blood Compartments.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Kate El BouzidiResearch Department of Infection and Population Health, University College London, London, UK k.elbouzidi@ucl.ac.uk.
Ellen WhiteMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, UK.
Jean L MbisaVirus Reference Department, Centre of Infections, Public Health England, London, UK.
Caroline A SabinResearch Department of Infection and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.
Andrew N PhillipsResearch Department of Infection and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.
Nicola MackieDepartment of HIV Medicine, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Anton L PozniakDepartment of Medicine, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Anna TostevinMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, UK.
Deenan PillayResearch Department of Infection, Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, UK.
David T DunnMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, UK.
UK HIV Drug Resistance Database
(UKHDRD) and the UK Collaborative HIV Cohort (UK CHIC) Study Steering Committees
UK HIV Drug Resistance Database (UKHDRD) and the UK Collaborative HIV Cohort (UK CHIC) Study Steering Committees

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_12023/15Medical Research Council MR/M004236/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 170461
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDarunavir is considered to have a high genetic barrier to resistance. Most darunavir-associated drug resistance mutations (DRMs) have been identified through correlation of baseline genotype with virological response in clinical trials. However, there is little information on DRMs that are directly selected by darunavir in clinical settings.

objectivesWe examined darunavir DRMs emerging in clinical practice in the UK. PATIENTS AND

methodsBaseline and post-exposure protease genotypes were compared for individuals in the UK Collaborative HIV Cohort Study who had received darunavir; analyses were stratified for PI history. A selection analysis was used to compare the evolution of subtype B proteases in darunavir recipients and matched PI-naive controls.

resultsOf 6918 people who had received darunavir, 386 had resistance tests pre- and post-exposure. Overall, 2.8% (11/386) of these participants developed emergent darunavir DRMs. The prevalence of baseline DRMs was 1.0% (2/198) among PI-naive participants and 13.8% (26/188) among PI-experienced participants. Emergent DRMs developed in 2.0% of the PI-naive group (4 mutations) and 3.7% of the PI-experienced group (12 mutations). Codon 77 was positively selected in the PI-naive darunavir cases, but not in the control group.

conclusionsOur findings suggest that although emergent darunavir resistance is rare, it may be more common among PI-experienced patients than those who are PI-naive. Further investigation is required to explore whether codon 77 is a novel site involved in darunavir susceptibility.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, ViralMutationAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesDarunavirFemaleHIV-1HIV InfectionsHIV Protease InhibitorsHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnited KingdomDarunavirHIV Protease Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID27856703
PMCPMC5181398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.