Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27856431›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of physiology. Cell physiology2017

Endoplasmic reticulum proteostasis: a key checkpoint in cancer.

Scott A Oakes

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of physiology. Cell physiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Scott A OakesDepartment of Pathology, Diabetes Center, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California scott.oakes@ucsf.edu.
UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

Molecular Pathology of CancerT32CA177555 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BASTIAN, BORIS C., OAKES, SCOTT A. · 2013 to 2017
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA177555
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The unfolded protein response (UPR) is an intracellular signaling network largely controlled by three endoplasmic reticulum (ER) transmembrane proteins, inositol-requiring enzyme 1α, PRK-like ER kinase, and activating transcription factor 6, that monitor the protein-folding status of the ER and initiate corrective measures to maintain ER homeostasis. Hypoxia, nutrient deprivation, proteasome dysfunction, sustained demands on the secretory pathway or somatic mutations in its client proteins, conditions often encountered by cancer cells, can lead to the accumulation of misfolded proteins in the ER and cause "ER stress." Under remediable levels of ER stress, the homeostatic UPR outputs activate transcriptional and translational changes that promote cellular adaptation. However, if the ER stress is irreversible despite these measures, a terminal UPR program supersedes that actively signals cell destruction. In addition to its prosurvival and prodeath outputs, the UPR is now recognized to play a major role in the differentiation and activation of specific immune cells, as well as proinflammatory cytokine production in many cell types. Given the numerous intrinsic and extrinsic factors that threaten the fidelity of the secretory pathway in cancer cells, it is not surprising that ER stress is documented in many solid and hematopoietic malignancies, but whether ongoing UPR signaling is beneficial or detrimental to tumor growth remains hotly debated. Here I review recent evidence that cancer cells are prone to loss of proteostasis within the ER, and hence may be susceptible to targeted interventions that either reduce homeostatic UPR outputs or alternatively trigger the terminal UPR.

Indexed as

Endoplasmic Reticulum StressUnfolded Protein ResponseAnimalsEndoplasmic ReticulumHomeostasisHumansModels, BiologicalNeoplasm ProteinsNeoplasmsProteostasis DeficienciesNeoplasm ProteinsATF6cancerendoplasmic reticulum stressIRE1αPERKprotein misfoldingunfolded protein response

Identifiers

PMID27856431
PMCPMC5336598
OpenAlexW2554316608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.