Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27856400›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology2017

Methodological issues in the use of individual brain measures to index trait liabilities: The example of noise-probe P3.

Emily R Perkins, James R Yancey, Laura E Drislane, Noah C Venables, Steve Balsis, Christopher J Patrick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Opposing Relations of Reward Positivity with Anhedonia and Threat Sensitivity: Implications for Differential Dimensional Diagnosis.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Using a co-twin control design to evaluate alternative trait measures as indices of liability for substance use disorders.International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology · 2020
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emily R PerkinsFlorida State University, United States.
James R YanceyFlorida State University, United States.
Laura E DrislaneFlorida State University, United States.
Noah C VenablesUniversity of Minnesota - Twin Cities, United States.
Steve BalsisTexas A&M University, United States.
Christopher J PatrickFlorida State University, United States. Electronic address: cpatrick@psy.fsu.edu.

Funding

Project 6: Individual Differences in the Motivational Substrates (pg 275)P50MH072850 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI LANG, PETER J · 2005 to 2009
$8.8M
Trait Fear and Disinhibition in Impulse Control DisordersRC1MH089727 · NIMH · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI PATRICK, CHRISTOPHER JOHN · 2009 to 2010
$942k
NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH072850NIMH NIH HHS RC1 MH089727
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent research initiatives have called for an increased use of biological concepts and measures in defining and studying mental health problems, but important measurement-related challenges confront efforts in this direction. This article highlights some of these challenges with reference to an intriguing measure of neural reactivity: the probe P3 response, a mid-latency brain potential evoked by an intense, unexpected acoustic-probe stimulus. Using data for a large adult sample (N=418), we report evidence that amplitude of probe P3 response to unwarned noise bursts occurring in a picture-viewing task exhibits robust, independent associations with two distinct trait constructs: weak inhibitory control (or disinhibition; DIS) and threat sensitivity (THT). Additionally, we report a selective association for THT with attentional suppression of probe P3 response during viewing of aversive pictures compared to neutral. These results point to separable elements of variance underlying the probe P3 response, including one element reflecting DIS-related variations in cognitive-elaborative processing, and others reflecting THT-related variations in aversive foreground engagement and abrupt defensive reorientation. Key measurement issues are considered in relation to these specific findings, and methodological and statistical approaches for addressing these issues are discussed in relation to advancement of a quantitatively sound, biologically informed science of psychopathology.

Indexed as

Inhibition, PsychologicalAdultEvent-Related Potentials, P300FearFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultDisinhibitionFearInhibitory controlP3PsychopathologyThreat sensitivity

Identifiers

PMID27856400
PMCPMC5222687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.