Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27856317›Full record

ReviewTransfusion and apheresis science : official journal of the World Apheresis Association : official journal of the European Society for Haemapheresis2016

Drug delivery by erythrocytes: "Primum non nocere".

Carlos H Villa, Jerard Seghatchian, Vladimir Muzykantov

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Transfusion and apheresis science : official journal of the World Apheresis Association : official journal of the European Society for Haemapheresis, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Delivery platforms forFrontiers in immunology · 2026
    Review
  2. In vivo CAR cell therapy: from bench to bedside.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Biomimetic erythrocyte-based drug delivery systems for organ-targeted therapy.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Nucleic Acid Delivery with Red-Blood-Cell-Based Carriers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Update on newer approaches to prevent or treat COVID-19 infection: What we all need the most right now!!Transfusion and apheresis science : official journal of the World Apheresis Association : official journal of the European Society for Haemapheresis · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Carlos H VillaDivision of Transfusion Medicine and Therapeutic Pathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jerard SeghatchianInternational Consultancy in Blood Components Quality/Safety Improvement & DDR Strategies, London, UK.
Vladimir MuzykantovDepartment of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. Electronic address: muzykant@mail.med.upenn.edu.
Translational Therapeutics (United States) · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

TRANSFUSION MEDICINE RESEARCH TRAINING PROGRAMT32HL007775 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SIEGEL, DONALD LAWRENCE · 1993 to 2023
$2.8M
Drug delivery by carrier erythrocytesR01HL121134 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MUZYKANTOV, VLADIMIR R · 2014 to 2017
$2.6M
Prevention and management of perioperative pulmonary embolismR01HL116916 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CINES, DOUGLAS BROCK, MUZYKANTOV, VLADIMIR R · 2013 to 2016
$1.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL116916NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL121134NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007775
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Red blood cells (RBCs) are naturally capable of transporting diverse cargoes throughout the circulatory system, both loaded to their surface or within their inner volume. Starting largely from the 1970s, diverse approaches for encapsulation into, and surface coupling onto, RBCs have been investigated as potential drug delivery systems. In the last decade, these efforts have yielded diverse strategies to load drugs and nanocarriers to RBCs, and to optimize their pharmacokinetics, distribution, and effects in the body. Several formulations of donor RBCs encapsulated with enzymes and drugs are currently undergoing clinical trials for treatment of oncologic and neurologic conditions. Newer approaches include design of drugs with an affinity to circulating RBCs, encapsulation into RBCs using membrane permeating compounds, and design of hybrid drug delivery systems combining synthetic components with fragments of RBC membranes. Notwithstanding the growing enthusiasm and optimism in RBC drug delivery, in this article we discuss potentially problematic issues of this biomedical concept, especially impairment of biocompatibility of the carrier RBCs, and other adverse and unintended effects. Rigorous and systematic analysis of the cautionary aspects described in this article should be further developed and extended in order to soberly gauge the risk/benefit balance of any given RBC-based drug delivery application. While there is little doubt that RBC drug delivery will ultimately flourish, focusing research efforts on approaches that are unlikely to cause adverse effects in patients will help to sooner bring this day.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsCell-Penetrating PeptidesChemistry, PharmaceuticalDrug CarriersErythrocytesHumansRisk FactorsCell-Penetrating PeptidesDrug CarriersAdverse effectsDrug targetingErythrocyte drug deliveryNanocarriersRBC

Identifiers

PMID27856317
PMCPMC5424546
OpenAlexW2548787054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.