Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27856307›Full record

ReviewAdvanced drug delivery reviews2017

Mechanoresponsive materials for drug delivery: Harnessing forces for controlled release.

Julia Wang, Jonah A Kaplan, Yolonda L Colson, Mark W Grinstaff

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced drug delivery reviews, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. A practical toolbox for modelling fibrosis in vitro.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Mechanically Triggered DNA Nanovehicles for Targeted Dual-Drug Cancer Therapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Effect of mechanical forces on cellular response to radiation.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Julia WangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, 590 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States.
Jonah A KaplanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, 590 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States.
Yolonda L ColsonDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, United States.
Mark W GrinstaffDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, 590 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States; Department of Chemistry, Boston University, 590 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States; Department of Medicine, Boston University, 590 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States. Electronic address: mgrin@bu.edu.

Funding

Translational Research in BiomaterialsT32EB006359 · NIBIB · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI MARK W. GRINSTAFF, Michelle H Teplensky · 2009 to 2026
$4.2M
NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB006359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanically-activated delivery systems harness existing physiological and/or externally-applied forces to provide spatiotemporal control over the release of active agents. Current strategies to deliver therapeutic proteins and drugs use three types of mechanical stimuli: compression, tension, and shear. Based on the intended application, each stimulus requires specific material selection, in terms of substrate composition and size (e.g., macrostructured materials and nanomaterials), for optimal in vitro and in vivo performance. For example, compressive systems typically utilize hydrogels or elastomeric substrates that respond to and withstand cyclic compressive loading, whereas, tension-responsive systems use composites to compartmentalize payloads. Finally, shear-activated systems are based on nanoassemblies or microaggregates that respond to physiological or externally-applied shear stresses. In order to provide a comprehensive assessment of current research on mechanoresponsive drug delivery, the mechanical stimuli intrinsically present in the human body are first discussed, along with the mechanical forces typically applied during medical device interventions, followed by in-depth descriptions of compression, tension, and shear-mediated drug delivery devices. We conclude by summarizing the progress of current research aimed at integrating mechanoresponsive elements within these devices, identifying additional clinical opportunities for mechanically-activated systems, and discussing future prospects.

Indexed as

Delayed-Action PreparationsDrug Delivery SystemsAnimalsHumansHydrogelsNanostructuresStress, MechanicalDelayed-Action PreparationsHydrogelsBiomaterialsCompressionDrug deliveryNanomaterialsShearTension

Identifiers

PMID27856307
PMCPMC5285479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.