ArticleJournal of biomechanics2017
Can time-averaged flow boundary conditions be used to meet the clinical timeline for Fontan surgical planning?
Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-Newtonian Effects on Patient-Specific Modeling of Fontan Hemodynamics.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2020Trial
- Active Machine Learning for Pre-procedural Prediction of Time-Varying Boundary Condition After Fontan Procedure Using Generative Adversarial Networks.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- In vivo hepatic flow distribution by computational fluid dynamics can predict pulmonary flow distribution in patients with Fontan circulation.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Computational Fluid Dynamics Support for Fontan Planning in Minutes, Not Hours: The Next Step in Clinical Pre-Interventional Simulations.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2022Article
- Is Doppler Echocardiography Adequate for Surgical Planning of Single Ventricle Patients?Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2021Article
- Engineering Perspective on Cardiovascular Simulations of Fontan Hemodynamics: Where Do We Stand with a Look Towards Clinical Application.Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2021Article
- Non-uniform mixing of hepatic venous flow and inferior vena cava flow in the Fontan conduit.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2021Article
- Interventional Planning for Endovascular Revision of a Lateral Tunnel Fontan: A Patient-Specific Computational Analysis.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Article
- Article
- Impact of Free-Breathing Phase-Contrast MRI on Decision-Making in Fontan Surgical Planning.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2020Article
- Comparison of Fontan Surgical Options for Patients with Apicocaval Juxtaposition.Pediatric cardiology · 2020Article
- Analysis of Inlet Velocity Profiles in Numerical Assessment of Fontan Hemodynamics.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2019Article
- The first cohort of prospective Fontan surgical planning patients with follow-up data: How accurate is surgical planning?The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2019Article
- The effect of respiration-driven flow waveforms on hemodynamic metrics used in Fontan surgical planning.Journal of biomechanics · 2019Article
- Physiological Fontan Procedure.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2019Article
- Fontan Surgical Planning: Previous Accomplishments, Current Challenges, and Future Directions.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2018Review
- The Advantages of Viscous Dissipation Rate over Simplified Power Loss as a Fontan Hemodynamic Metric.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiovascular simulations have great potential as a clinical tool for planning and evaluating patient-specific treatment strategies for those suffering from congenital heart diseases, specifically Fontan patients. However, several bottlenecks have delayed wider deployment of the simulations for clinical use; the main obstacle is simulation cost. Currently, time-averaged clinical flow measurements are utilized as numerical boundary conditions (BCs) in order to reduce the computational power and time needed to offer surgical planning within a clinical time frame. Nevertheless, pulsatile blood flow is observed in vivo, and its significant impact on numerical simulations has been demonstrated. Therefore, it is imperative to carry out a comprehensive study analyzing the sensitivity of using time-averaged BCs. In this study, sensitivity is evaluated based on the discrepancies between hemodynamic metrics calculated using time-averaged and pulsatile BCs; smaller discrepancies indicate less sensitivity. The current study incorporates a comparison between 3D patient-specific CFD simulations using both the time-averaged and pulsatile BCs for 101 Fontan patients. The sensitivity analysis involves two clinically important hemodynamic metrics: hepatic flow distribution (HFD) and indexed power loss (iPL). Paired demographic group comparisons revealed that HFD sensitivity is significantly different between single and bilateral superior vena cava cohorts but no other demographic discrepancies were observed for HFD or iPL. Multivariate regression analyses show that the best predictors for sensitivity involve flow pulsatilities, time-averaged flow rates, and geometric characteristics of the Fontan connection. These predictors provide patient-specific guidelines to determine the effectiveness of analyzing patient-specific surgical options with time-averaged BCs within a clinical time frame.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.