ReviewJournal of the American College of Cardiology2016
Computed Tomography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Ischemic Heart Disease.
Review in Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.
- Contemporary Challenges and Strategies for Diagnosing and Managing in Type 2 Myocardial Infarction: A Narrative Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Multimodality Imaging in Myocarditis: Integrating Etiology, Diagnosis, and Risk Stratification.Current cardiology reports · 2026Review
- Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Alcohol-Related Myocardial Injury: A Comprehensive Review.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Prospective comparison of ultra-high-resolution photon-counting detector CT coronary angiography versus conventional CT.The British journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Feasibility and Role of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Intensive and Acute Cardiovascular Care.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Left Atrial Strain in the Prediction of Death, Ischemic Stroke, and Heart Failure.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Article
- Three-Dimensionally Printed Elastic Cardiovascular Phantoms for Carotid Angioplasty Training and Personalized Healthcare.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Diagnostic performance of coronary computed tomography angiography stenosis score for coronary stenosis.BMC medical imaging · 2024Article
- Prediction of Hemodynamic-Related Hemolysis in Carotid Stenosis and Aiding in Treatment Planning and Risk Stratification Using Computational Fluid Dynamics.Biomedicines · 2023Article
- Comparison of Photon-counting Detector and Energy-integrating Detector CT for Visual Estimation of Coronary Percent Luminal Stenosis.Radiology · 2023Article
- The Role of Non-Invasive Multimodality Imaging in Chronic Coronary Syndrome: Anatomical and Functional Pathways.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Papillary-Muscle-Derived Radiomic Features for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy versus Hypertensive Heart Disease Classification.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Emerging molecular imaging targets and tools for myocardial fibrosis detection.European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging · 2023Article
- Left Ventricular Adverse Remodeling in Ischemic Heart Disease: Emerging Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Biomarkers.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Myocardial Function Prediction After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Using MRI Radiomic Features and Machine Learning Algorithms.Journal of digital imaging · 2022Article
- State-of-the-Art Review: Technical and Imaging Considerations in Hybrid Transcatheter and Minimally Invasive Left Ventricular Reconstruction for Ischemic Heart Failure.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Contrast-enhanced computed tomography assessment of aortic stenosis.Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2021Article
- Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging for structural heart disease.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2020Review
- Ultra-high resolution, 3-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging of the atherosclerotic vessel wall at clinical 7T.PloS one · 2020Article
- Emerging techniques in atherosclerosis imaging.The British journal of radiology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Ischemic heart disease is a complex disease process caused by the development of coronary atherosclerosis, with downstream effects on the left ventricular myocardium. It is characterized by a long preclinical phase, abrupt development of myocardial infarction, and more chronic disease states such as stable angina and ischemic cardiomyopathy. Recent advances in computed tomography (CT) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) now allow detailed imaging of each of these different phases of the disease, potentially allowing ischemic heart disease to be tracked during a patient's lifetime. In particular, CT has emerged as the noninvasive modality of choice for imaging the coronary arteries, whereas CMR offers detailed assessments of myocardial perfusion, viability, and function. The clinical utility of these techniques is increasingly being supported by robust randomized controlled trial data, although the widespread adoption of cardiac CT and CMR will require further evidence of clinical efficacy and cost effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.