Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27855778›Full record

ArticleeLife2016

Inhibition in the auditory brainstem enhances signal representation and regulates gain in complex acoustic environments.

Christian Keine, Rudolf Rübsamen, Bernhard Englitz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Neuronal processing of complex sounds in the prothoracic ganglion of a bushcricket.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Modeling the Short-Term Dynamics ofThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christian KeineFaculty of Bioscience, Pharmacy and Psychology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8953-2593
Rudolf RübsamenFaculty of Bioscience, Pharmacy and Psychology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Bernhard EnglitzDepartment of Neurophysiology, Donders Center for Neuroscience, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9106-0356

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inhibition plays a crucial role in neural signal processing, shaping and limiting responses. In the auditory system, inhibition already modulates second order neurons in the cochlear nucleus, e.g. spherical bushy cells (SBCs). While the physiological basis of inhibition and excitation is well described, their functional interaction in signal processing remains elusive. Using a combination of in vivo loose-patch recordings, iontophoretic drug application, and detailed signal analysis in the Mongolian Gerbil, we demonstrate that inhibition is widely co-tuned with excitation, and leads only to minor sharpening of the spectral response properties. Combinations of complex stimuli and neuronal input-output analysis based on spectrotemporal receptive fields revealed inhibition to render the neuronal output temporally sparser and more reproducible than the input. Overall, inhibition plays a central role in improving the temporal response fidelity of SBCs across a wide range of input intensities and thereby provides the basis for high-fidelity signal processing.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationEvoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemNeural InhibitionAction PotentialsAnimalsAuditory PathwaysBrain StemGerbillinaePatch-Clamp Techniquescochlear nucleusinhibitionMongolian gerbilneurosciencesound localizationspherical bushy cell

Identifiers

PMID27855778
PMCPMC5148601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.