Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27855720›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2016

Pharmacological interventions for agitation in patients with traumatic brain injury: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

David R Williamson, Anne Julie Frenette, Lisa Burry, Marc M Perreault, Emmanuel Charbonney, François Lamontagne, Marie-Julie Potvin, Jean-François Giguère, Sangeeta Mehta, Francis Bernard

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

David R WilliamsonPharmacy Department and Research Center, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, 5400 Gouin West, Montreal, Quebec, H4J 1C5, Canada. david.williamson@umontreal.ca.
Anne Julie FrenettePharmacy Department and Research Center, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, 5400 Gouin West, Montreal, Quebec, H4J 1C5, Canada.
Lisa BurryDepartment of Pharmacy and Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
Marc M PerreaultFaculté de pharmacie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
Emmanuel CharbonneyDepartment of Critical Care and Research Center, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
François LamontagneDepartment of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada.
Marie-Julie PotvinDepartment of Psychology, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
Jean-François GiguèreFaculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
Sangeeta MehtaDepartment of Medicine, Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
Francis BernardDepartment of Critical Care and Research Center, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal · CAUniversité de Montréal · CAUniversity of Toronto · CAMcGill University Health Centre · CAUniversité de Sherbrooke · CAUniversité du Québec à Montréal · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraumatic brain injury (TBI) is a worldwide leading cause of mortality and disability. Among TBI complications, agitation is a frequent behavioural problem. Agitation causes potential harm to patients and caregivers, interferes with treatments, leads to unnecessary chemical and physical restraints, increases hospital length of stay, delays rehabilitation, and impedes functional independence. Pharmacological treatments are often considered for agitation management following TBI. Several types of agents have been proposed for the treatment of agitation. However, the benefit and safety of these agents in TBI patients as well as their differential effects and interactions are uncertain. In addition, animal studies and observational studies have suggested impaired cognitive function with the use of certain antipsychotics and benzodiazepines. Hence, a safe and effective treatment for agitation, which does not interfere with neurological recovery, remains to be identified. METHODS/

designWith the help of Health Sciences librarian, we will design a search strategy in the following databases: PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE®, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, Directory of Open Access Journals, LILACS, Web of Science, and Prospero. A grey literature search will be performed using the resources suggested in CADTH's Grey Matters. We will include all randomized controlled, quasi-experimental, and observational studies with control groups. The population of interest is all patients, including children and adults, who have suffered a TBI. We will include studies in which agitation, not further defined, was the presenting symptom or one of the presenting symptoms. We will also include studies where agitation was not the presenting symptom but was measured as an outcome variable and studies assessing the safety of these pharmacological interventions in TBI patients. We will include studies evaluating all pharmacological interventions including beta-adrenergic blockers, typical and atypical antipsychotics, anticonvulsants, dopamine agonists, psychostimulants, antidepressants, alpha-2-adrenergic agonists, hypnotics, and anxiolytics. DISCUSSION: Although agitation is frequent following TBI and pharmacological agents that are often used, there is no consensus on the most efficacious and safest strategy to treat these complications. There is a need for an updated systematic review to summarize the evidence in order to inform practice and future research. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42016033140.

Indexed as

Problem BehaviorAdolescentAdultBrain Injuries, TraumaticCentral Nervous System AgentsChildChild, PreschoolCognitionFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMental DisordersMeta-Analysis as TopicPsychomotor AgitationCentral Nervous System AgentsAgitationPharmacological interventionTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID27855720
PMCPMC5114826
OpenAlexW2554109283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.