Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27855714›Full record

Trial reportTrials2016

The NOURISHED randomised controlled trial comparing mentalisation-based treatment for eating disorders (MBT-ED) with specialist supportive clinical management (SSCM-ED) for patients with eating disorders and symptoms of borderline personality disorder.

Paul Robinson, Jennifer Hellier, Barbara Barrett, Daiva Barzdaitiene, Anthony Bateman, Alexandra Bogaardt, Ajay Clare, Nadia Somers, Aine O'Callaghan, Kimberley Goldsmith and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 129 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Systematic Review on Mentalization as Key Factor in Psychotherapy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Paul RobinsonUniversity College London, London, UK. p.robinson@ucl.ac.uk.
Jennifer HellierIOPPN, King's College London, London, UK.
Barbara BarrettIOPPN, King's College London, London, UK.
Daiva BarzdaitieneKent and Medway Partnership Trust, The Red House, Maidstone, UK.
Anthony BatemanUniversity College London, London, UK.
Alexandra BogaardtBarnet Enfield and Haringey Mental Health Trust, St Ann's Hospital, London, UK.
Ajay ClareBarnet Enfield and Haringey Mental Health Trust, St Ann's Hospital, London, UK.
Nadia SomersBarnet Enfield and Haringey Mental Health Trust, St Ann's Hospital, London, UK.
Aine O'CallaghanBarnet Enfield and Haringey Mental Health Trust, St Ann's Hospital, London, UK.
Kimberley GoldsmithIOPPN, King's College London, London, UK.
Nikola KernSouth London and the Maudsley NHS Trust, London, UK.
Ulrike SchmidtIOPPN, King's College London, London, UK.
Sara MorandoBarnet Enfield and Haringey Mental Health Trust, St Ann's Hospital, London, UK.
Catherine Ouellet-CourtoisBarnet Enfield and Haringey Mental Health Trust, St Ann's Hospital, London, UK.
Alice RobertsUniversity College London, London, UK.
Finn SkårderudInstitute for Eating Disorders, Oslo, Norway.
Peter FonagyUniversity College London, London, UK.
Barnet Enfield and Haringey Mental Health Trust · GBKing's College London · GBUniversity College London · GBSt Ann’s Hospital · GBAnna Freud Centre · GBKent and Medway NHS and Social Care Partnership Trust · GBSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn this multi-centre randomized controlled trial (RCT) we compared modified mentalisation-based treatment (MBT-ED) to specialist supportive clinical management (SSCM-ED) in patients with eating disorders (EDs) and borderline personality disorder symptoms (BPD). This group of patients presents complex challenges to clinical services, and a treatment which addresses their multiple problems has the potential to improve outcome. MBT has been shown to be effective in improving outcome in patients with BPD, but its use has not been reported in ED.

methodsSixty-eight eligible participants were randomised to MBT-ED or SSCM-ED. The primary outcome measure was the global score on the Eating Disorder Examination. Secondary outcomes included measures of BPD symptoms (the Zanarini Rating Scale for Borderline Personality Disorder), general psychiatric state, quality of life and service utilisation. Participants were assessed at baseline and at 6, 12 and 18 months after randomisation. Analysis was performed using linear mixed models.

resultsOnly 15 participants (22 %) completed the 18 month follow-up. Early drop-out occurred significantly more in the SSCM-ED group. Drop-out did not vary with treatment model later in therapy and was sometimes attributed to participants moving away. There was higher drop--out amongst smokers and those with higher neuroticism scores. 47.1 % of participants in the MBT-ED arm and 37.1 % in the SSCM-ED arm attended at least 50 % of therapy sessions offered. Amongst those remaining in the trial, at 12 and 18 months MBT-ED was associated with a greater reduction in Shape Concern and Weight Concern in the Eating Disorder Examination compared to SSCM-ED. At 6, 12 and 18 months there was a decline of ED and BPD symptoms in both groups combined. Ten participants were reported as having had adverse events during the trial, mostly self-harm, and there was one death, attributed as 'unexplained' by the coroner.

conclusionsThe high drop-out rate made interpretation of the results difficult. Greater involvement of research staff in clinical management might have improved compliance with both therapy and research assessment. MBT-ED may have had an impact on core body image psychopathology.

trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials: ISRCTN51304415 . Registered on 19 April 2011.

Indexed as

Theory of MindAdultBorderline Personality DisorderFeeding and Eating DisordersFemaleHumansMalePatient CompliancePatient SelectionSingle-Blind MethodBorderline personality disorderDrop-outEating disordersMentalisation-based treatmentPsychotherapyRandomised controlled trialSpecialist supportive clinical management

Identifiers

PMID27855714
PMCPMC5114835
OpenAlexW2543643398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.