Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27855710›Full record

ArticleTrials2016

Integrating technology into complex intervention trial processes: a case study.

Cheney J G Drew, Vincent Poile, Rob Trubey, Gareth Watson, Mark Kelson, Julia Townson, Anne Rosser, Kerenza Hood, Lori Quinn, Monica Busse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Cheney J G DrewSouth East Wales Trials Unit, Centre For Trials Research, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, 7th Floor Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK.
Vincent PoileSouth East Wales Trials Unit, Centre For Trials Research, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, 7th Floor Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK.
Rob TrubeySouth East Wales Trials Unit, Centre For Trials Research, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, 7th Floor Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK.
Gareth WatsonSouth East Wales Trials Unit, Centre For Trials Research, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, 7th Floor Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK.
Mark KelsonSouth East Wales Trials Unit, Centre For Trials Research, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, 7th Floor Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK.
Julia TownsonSouth East Wales Trials Unit, Centre For Trials Research, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, 7th Floor Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK.
Anne RosserSchool of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Biosciences 3, Park Place, Cardiff, CF10 3BB, UK.
Kerenza HoodSouth East Wales Trials Unit, Centre For Trials Research, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, 7th Floor Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK.
Lori QuinnDepartment of Biobehavioral Sciences, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Monica BusseSouth East Wales Trials Unit, Centre For Trials Research, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, 7th Floor Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK. busseme@cardiff.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-5331-5909

Funding

HCRW_ NIHR-FS-2012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTrials of complex interventions are associated with high costs and burdens in terms of paperwork, management, data collection, validation, and intervention fidelity assessment occurring across multiple sites. Traditional data collection methods rely on paper-based forms, where processing can be time-consuming and error rates high. Electronic source data collection can potentially address many of these inefficiencies, but has not routinely been used in complex intervention trials. Here we present the use of an on-line system for managing all aspects of data handling and for the monitoring of trial processes in a multicentre trial of a complex intervention. We custom built a web-accessible software application for the delivery of ENGAGE-HD, a multicentre trial of a complex physical therapy intervention. The software incorporated functionality for participant randomisation, data collection and assessment of intervention fidelity. It was accessible to multiple users with differing levels of access depending on required usage or to maintain blinding. Each site was supplied with a 4G-enabled iPad for accessing the system. The impact of this system was quantified through review of data quality and collation of feedback from site coordinators and assessors through structured process interviews.

resultsThe custom-built system was an efficient tool for collecting data and managing trial processes. Although the set-up time required was significant, using the system resulted in an overall data completion rate of 98.5% with a data query rate of 0.1%, the majority of which were resolved in under a week. Feedback from research staff indicated that the system was highly acceptable for use in a research environment. This was a reflection of the portability and accessibility of the system when using the iPad and its usefulness in aiding accurate data collection, intervention fidelity and general administration.

conclusionsA combination of commercially available hardware and a bespoke online database designed to support data collection, intervention fidelity and trial progress provides a viable option for streamlining trial processes in a multicentre complex intervention trial. There is scope to further extend the system to cater for larger trials and add further functionality such as automatic reporting facilities and participant management support.

trial registrationISRCTN65378754 , registered on 13 March 2014.

Indexed as

Data CollectionHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicResearch DesignComplex intervention trialsDatabase designData collectionFidelityProcess evaluationTechnology

Identifiers

PMID27855710
PMCPMC5114753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.