Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27855685›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2016

Understanding the barriers to successful adoption and use of a mobile health information system in a community health center in São Paulo, Brazil: a cohort study.

Jayant V Rajan, Juliana Moura, Gato Gourley, Karina Kiso, Alexandre Sizilio, Ana Maria Cortez, Lee W Riley, Maria Amelia Veras, Urmimala Sarkar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Healthcare Workers' Perspectives of mHealth Adoption Factors in the Developing World: Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Regulatory Sandboxes: A Cure for mHealth Pilotitis?Journal of medical Internet research · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jayant V RajanDepartment of Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, 1001 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94110, USA. Jayant.Rajan@ucsf.edu.
Juliana MouraFaculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo, Rua Dr. Cesário Motta Jr., 61, Vila Buarque, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Gato GourleyCenter for Vulnerable Populations, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, 1001 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94110, USA.
Karina KisoFaculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo, Rua Dr. Cesário Motta Jr., 61, Vila Buarque, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Alexandre SizilioCenter for Vulnerable Populations, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, 1001 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94110, USA.
Ana Maria CortezFaculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo, Rua Dr. Cesário Motta Jr., 61, Vila Buarque, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Lee W RileySchool of Public Health, 530 E Li Ka Shing Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.
Maria Amelia VerasFaculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo, Rua Dr. Cesário Motta Jr., 61, Vila Buarque, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Urmimala SarkarDepartment of Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, 1001 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94110, USA.

Funding

Research Mentoring and Building Capacity of underrepresented Minority Research Scientists in India.D43TW010540 · FIC · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MICHELE BARRY, Eva Harris · 2017 to 2026
$15.5M
Global Health Fellows and Scholars Research TrainingR25TW009338 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI BARRY, MICHELE, KO, ALBERT ICKSANG · 2012 to 2016
$5.2M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW010540FIC NIH HHS R25 TW009338
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMobile technology to support community health has surged in popularity, yet few studies have systematically examined usability of mobile platforms for this setting.

methodsWe conducted a mixed-methods study of 14 community healthcare workers at a public healthcare clinic in São Paulo, Brazil. We held focus groups with community healthcare workers to elicit their ideas about a mobile health application and used this input to build a prototype app. A pre-use test survey was administered to all participants, who subsequently use-tested the app on three different devices (iPhone, iPad mini, iPad Air). Usability was assessed by objectively scored data entry errors and through a post-use focus group held to gather open-ended feedback on end-user satisfaction.

resultsAll of the participants were women, ranging from 18-64 years old. A large percentage (85.7%) of participants had at least a high school education. Internet (92.8%), computer (85.7%) and cell phone (71.4%) use rates were high. Data entry error rates were also high, particularly in free text fields, ranging from 92.3 to 100%. Error rates were comparable across device type. In a post-use focus group, participants reported that they found the app easy to use and felt that its design was consistent with their vision. The participants raised several concerns, including that they did not find filling out the forms in the app to be a useful task. They also were concerned about an app potentially creating more work for them and personal security issues related to carrying a mobile device in low-income areas.

conclusionIn a cohort of formally educated community healthcare workers with high levels of personal computer and cell phone use, we identified no technological barriers to adapting their existing work to a mobile device based system. Transferring current data entry work into a mobile platform, however, uncovered underlying dissatisfaction with some data entry tasks. This dissatisfaction may be a more significant barrier than the data entry errors our testing revealed. Our results highlight the fact that without a deep understanding of local process to optimize usability, technology-based solutions in health may fail. Developing such an understanding must be a central component in the design of any mHealth solution in global health.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelAdolescentAdultBrazilCohort StudiesCommunity Health CentersDelivery of Health CareFemaleHealth Information SystemsHumansMaleMiddle AgedTelemedicineYoung AdultBrazilmHealthUsability

Identifiers

PMID27855685
PMCPMC5114819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.