Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27855645›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2016

Introducing Explorer of Taxon Concepts with a case study on spider measurement matrix building.

Hong Cui, Dongfang Xu, Steven S Chong, Martin Ramirez, Thomas Rodenhausen, James A Macklin, Bertram Ludäscher, Robert A Morris, Eduardo M Soto, Nicolás Mongiardino Koch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hong CuiUniversity of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA. hongcui@email.arizona.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0828-1102
Dongfang XuUniversity of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Steven S ChongUniversity of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Martin RamirezMuseo Argentino de Ciencias, Naturales, CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Thomas RodenhausenUniversity of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
James A MacklinAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, Canada.
Bertram LudäscherUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, USA.
Robert A MorrisUniversity of Massachusetts at Boston and Harvard University Herbaria, Massachusetts, USA.
Eduardo M SotoDepartment of Geology & Geophysics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Nicolás Mongiardino KochDepartment of Geology & Geophysics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTaxonomic descriptions are traditionally composed in natural language and published in a format that cannot be directly used by computers. The Exploring Taxon Concepts (ETC) project has been developing a set of web-based software tools that convert morphological descriptions published in telegraphic style to character data that can be reused and repurposed. This paper introduces the first semi-automated pipeline, to our knowledge, that converts morphological descriptions into taxon-character matrices to support systematics and evolutionary biology research. We then demonstrate and evaluate the use of the ETC Input Creation - Text Capture - Matrix Generation pipeline to generate body part measurement matrices from a set of 188 spider morphological descriptions and report the findings.

resultsFrom the given set of spider taxonomic publications, two versions of input (original and normalized) were generated and used by the ETC Text Capture and ETC Matrix Generation tools. The tools produced two corresponding spider body part measurement matrices, and the matrix from the normalized input was found to be much more similar to a gold standard matrix hand-curated by the scientist co-authors. Special conventions utilized in the original descriptions (e.g., the omission of measurement units) were attributed to the lower performance of using the original input. The results show that simple normalization of the description text greatly increased the quality of the machine-generated matrix and reduced edit effort. The machine-generated matrix also helped identify issues in the gold standard matrix.

conclusionsETC Text Capture and ETC Matrix Generation are low-barrier and effective tools for extracting measurement values from spider taxonomic descriptions and are more effective when the descriptions are self-contained. Special conventions that make the description text less self-contained challenge automated extraction of data from biodiversity descriptions and hinder the automated reuse of the published knowledge. The tools will be updated to support new requirements revealed in this case study.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionSoftwareAnimalsHumansSpidersETCEvaluationExplorer of Taxon ConceptsInformation extractionNatural language processingPhenotypic charactersPhenotypic traitsSpidersTaxonomic morphological descriptionsText mining

Identifiers

PMID27855645
PMCPMC5114841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.