ArticleBMC bioinformatics2016
Protein ligand-specific binding residue predictions by an ensemble classifier.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- LiBRe: A Ligand-Aware Sequence-Based Binding Residue Prediction Model for Virtual Screening.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- ViralBindPredict: empowering viral protein-ligand binding sites through deep learning and protein sequence-derived insights.GigaScience · 2026Article
- The Human Omnibus of Targetable Pockets.Journal of cheminformatics · 2025Article
- Machine Learning in Enhancing Protein Binding Sites Predictions - What Has Changed Since Then?Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening · 2025Review
- A comprehensive review of protein-centric predictors for biomolecular interactions: from proteins to nucleic acids and beyond.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Review
- S-DCNN: prediction of ATP binding residues by deep convolutional neural network based on SMOTE.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- Prediction of Protein Ion-Ligand Binding Sites with ELECTRA.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Artificial intelligence in the prediction of protein-ligand interactions: recent advances and future directions.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2022Review
- Prediction of metal ion ligand binding residues by adding disorder value and propensity factors based on deep learning algorithm.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- A Comprehensive Review of Computation-Based Metal-Binding Prediction Approaches at the Residue Level.BioMed research international · 2022Review
- Recognition of Metal Ion Ligand-Binding Residues by Adding Correlation Features and Propensity Factors.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Recognizing Ion Ligand-Binding Residues by Random Forest Algorithm Based on Optimized Dihedral Angle.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Article
- The Identification of Metal Ion Ligand-Binding Residues by Adding the Reclassified Relative Solvent Accessibility.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Recognizing ion ligand binding sites by SMO algorithm.BMC molecular and cell biology · 2019Article
- Prediction of acid radical ion binding residues by K-nearest neighbors classifier.BMC molecular and cell biology · 2019Article
- Comparative analysis of interactions between aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligand binding domain with its ligands: a computational study.BMC structural biology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrediction of ligand binding sites is important to elucidate protein functions and is helpful for drug design. Although much progress has been made, many challenges still need to be addressed. Prediction methods need to be carefully developed to account for chemical and structural differences between ligands.
resultsIn this study, we present ligand-specific methods to predict the binding sites of protein-ligand interactions. First, a sequence-based method is proposed that only extracts features from protein sequence information, including evolutionary conservation scores and predicted structure properties. An improved AdaBoost algorithm is applied to address the serious imbalance problem between the binding and non-binding residues. Then, a combined method is proposed that combines the current template-free method and four other well-established template-based methods. The above two methods predict the ligand binding sites along the sequences using a ligand-specific strategy that contains metal ions, acid radical ions, nucleotides and ferroheme. Testing on a well-established dataset showed that the proposed sequence-based method outperformed the profile-based method by 4-19% in terms of the Matthews correlation coefficient on different ligands. The combined method outperformed each of the individual methods, with an improvement in the average Matthews correlation coefficients of 5.55% over all ligands. The results also show that the ligand-specific methods significantly outperform the general-purpose methods, which confirms the necessity of developing elaborate ligand-specific methods for ligand binding site prediction.
conclusionsTwo efficient ligand-specific binding site predictors are presented. The standalone package is freely available for academic usage at http://dase.ecnu.edu.cn/qwdong/TargetCom/TargetCom_standalone.tar.gz or request upon the corresponding author.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.