Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27855083›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2016

Consumption of energy drinks by children and young people: a rapid review examining evidence of physical effects and consumer attitudes.

Shelina Visram, Mandy Cheetham, Deborah M Riby, Stephen J Crossley, Amelia A Lake

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. A Mixed Method Study Exploring Children and Young People's Perception of Energy Drinks and Analysing Consumption Patterns.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shelina VisramSchool of Medicine, Pharmacy and Health, Durham University Queen's Campus, Stockton-on-Tees, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9576-2689
Mandy CheethamFuse (UKCRC Centre for Translational Research in Public Health), Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK.
Deborah M RibyDepartment of Psychology, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Stephen J CrossleySchool of Medicine, Pharmacy and Health, Durham University Queen's Campus, Stockton-on-Tees, UK.
Amelia A LakeSchool of Medicine, Pharmacy and Health, Durham University Queen's Campus, Stockton-on-Tees, UK.

Funding

British Heart FoundationCancer Research UKMedical Research Council MR/K02325X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine patterns of energy drink consumption by children and young people, attitudes towards these drinks, and any associations with health or other outcomes.

designRapid evidence assessment and narrative synthesis. DATA SOURCES: 9 electronic bibliographic databases, reference lists of relevant studies and searches of the internet.

resultsA total of 410 studies were located, with 46 meeting the inclusion criteria. The majority employed a cross-sectional design, involved participants aged 11-18 years, and were conducted in North America or Europe. Consumption of energy drinks by children and young people was found to be patterned by gender, with boys consuming more than girls, and also by activity levels, with the highest consumption observed in the most and least sedentary individuals. Several studies identified a strong, positive association between the use of energy drinks and higher odds of health-damaging behaviours, as well as physical health symptoms such as headaches, stomach aches, hyperactivity and insomnia. There was some evidence of a dose-response effect. 2 experimental studies involving small numbers of junior athletes demonstrated a positive impact on limited aspects of sports performance. 3 themes emerged from the qualitative studies: reasons for use; influences on use; and perceived efficacy and impact. Taste and energy-seeking were identified as key drivers, and branding and marketing were highlighted as major influences on young people's consumption choices. Awareness of possible negative effects was low.

conclusionsThere is growing evidence that consumption of energy drinks is associated with a range of adverse outcomes and risk behaviours in terms of children's health and well-being. However, taste, brand loyalty and perceived positive effects combine to ensure their popularity with young consumers. More research is needed to explore the short-term and long-term impacts in all spheres, including health, behaviour and education. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42014010192.

Indexed as

Carbonated BeveragesChoice BehaviorConsumer BehaviorEnergy DrinksHealth BehaviorAdolescentCaffeineChildCross-Sectional StudiesDietary SucroseEnergy IntakeEuropeHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansNorth AmericaQualitative ResearchCaffeineDietary Sucrosecaffeinechild healthenergy drinkssugarsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID27855083
PMCPMC5073652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.