Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27855072›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2017

Clinical Benefit of Appropriate Empirical Fluoroquinolone Therapy for Adults with Community-Onset Bacteremia in Comparison with Third-Generation-Cephalosporin Therapy.

Ching-Chi Lee, Jiun-Ling Wang, Chung-Hsun Lee, Chih-Chia Hsieh, Yuan-Pin Hung, Ming-Yuan Hong, Hung-Jen Tang, Wen-Chien Ko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Age-Related Trends in Adults with Community-Onset Bacteremia.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2017
    Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ching-Chi LeeDivision of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Madou Sin-Lau Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan.
Jiun-Ling WangDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Chung-Hsun LeeDepartment of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Chih-Chia HsiehDepartment of Emergency Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Yuan-Pin HungDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Ming-Yuan HongDepartment of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Hung-Jen TangDepartment of Medicine, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan 8409d1@gmail.com winston3415@gmail.com.
Wen-Chien KoDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan 8409d1@gmail.com winston3415@gmail.com.
National Cheng Kung University Hospital · TWNational Cheng Kung University · TWChia Nan University of Pharmacy and Science · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Both fluoroquinolones (FQs) and third-generation cephalosporins (3rd-GCs) are commonly prescribed to treat bloodstream infections, but comparative efficacies between them were rarely studied. Demographics and clinical characteristics of 733 adults with polymicrobial or monomicrobial community-onset bacteremia empirically treated by an appropriate FQ (n = 87) or 3rd-GC (n = 646) were compared. A critical illness (respectively, 8.0% versus 19.0%; P = 0.01), an initial syndrome with severe sepsis (33.3% versus 50.3%; P = 0.003), or a fatal outcome at 28 days (4.6% versus 10.5%; P = 0.08) was less common in the FQ group. A total of 645 (88.0%) patients were febrile at initial presentation, and the FQ group with (FQ group versus 3rd-GC group, respectively, 7.6 days versus 12.0 days; P = 0.04) and without (3.8 days versus 5.4 days; P = 0.001) a critical illness had a shorter time to defervescence than the 3rd-GC group. By the propensity scores, 87 patients with appropriate FQ therapy were matched with 435 treated by 3rd-GC therapy at a ratio of 1:5, and there were no significant differences in terms of bacteremia severity, comorbidity severity, major comorbidities, causative microorganisms, and bacteremia sources between groups. Moreover, crude mortality rates at 28 days (FQ group versus 3rd-GC group, respectively, 4.6% versus 7.8%; P = 0.29) did not differ significantly. However, the time to defervescence was shorter in the FQ group (4.2 ± 3.6 versus 6.2 ± 7.6 days; P < 0.001). Conclusively in the adults with community-onset bacteremia, appropriate empirical FQ therapy was related to shorter time to defervescence than with 3rd-GC therapy, at least for those without a critical illness.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteremiaCephalosporinsCommunity-Acquired InfectionsFemaleFluoroquinolonesHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleAnti-Bacterial AgentsCephalosporinsFluoroquinolonesbacteremiacommunity onsetdefervescenceempirical therapyfluoroquinolonethird-generation cephalosporin

Identifiers

PMID27855072
PMCPMC5278695
OpenAlexW2549637819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.