Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27854363›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2016

Indel variant analysis of short-read sequencing data with Scalpel.

Han Fang, Ewa A Bergmann, Kanika Arora, Vladimir Vacic, Michael C Zody, Ivan Iossifov, Jason A O'Rawe, Yiyang Wu, Laura T Jimenez Barron, Julie Rosenbaum and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Impact of Tumor Genomic Profile on Adjuvant Chemotherapy Efficacy in Resected Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Results From the PRODIGE-24/CCTG PA6 Study.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. bronko: ultrafast, alignment-free detection of viral genome variation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. A complete diploid human genome benchmark for personalized genomics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Han FangSimons Center for Quantitative Biology, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4010-2525
Ewa A BergmannNew York Genome Center, New York, New York, USA.
Kanika AroraNew York Genome Center, New York, New York, USA.
Vladimir VacicNew York Genome Center, New York, New York, USA.
Michael C ZodyNew York Genome Center, New York, New York, USA.
Ivan IossifovSimons Center for Quantitative Biology, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, USA.
Jason A O'RaweStanley Institute for Cognitive Genomics, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, USA.
Yiyang WuStanley Institute for Cognitive Genomics, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9231-7093
Laura T Jimenez BarronStanley Institute for Cognitive Genomics, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, USA.
Julie RosenbaumSimons Center for Quantitative Biology, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, USA.
Michael RonemusSimons Center for Quantitative Biology, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, USA.
Yoon-Ha LeeSimons Center for Quantitative Biology, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, USA.
Zihua WangSimons Center for Quantitative Biology, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, USA.
Esra DikogluStanley Institute for Cognitive Genomics, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, USA.
Vaidehi JobanputraStanley Institute for Cognitive Genomics, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, USA.
Gholson J LyonStanley Institute for Cognitive Genomics, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5869-0716
Michael WiglerSimons Center for Quantitative Biology, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, USA.
Michael C SchatzSimons Center for Quantitative Biology, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, USA.
Giuseppe NarzisiSimons Center for Quantitative Biology, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, USA.

Funding

Single-Cell Biology Shared ResourceP30CA045508 · NCI · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI John Edward Moses · 1987 to 2026
$118.9M
Computational Methods for Genome Assembly, Transcript Assembly, and Variant DiscoveryR01HG006677 · NHGRI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SALZBERG, STEVEN L. · 2011 to 2025
$10.7M
COMPUTATIONAL AND FUNCTIONAL APPROACHES TO VALIDATING CANCER GENOME TARGETSU01CA168409 · NCI · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI POWERS, SCOTT · 2012 to 2016
$7.3M
Next Generation DNA SequencerS10OD020122 · OD · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI MCCOMBIE, WILLIAM RICHARD · 2015 to 2015
$523k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA045508NCI NIH HHS U01 CA168409NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG006677NIH HHS S10 OD020122
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the second most common type of variation in the human genome, insertions and deletions (indels) have been linked to many diseases, but the discovery of indels of more than a few bases in size from short-read sequencing data remains challenging. Scalpel (http://scalpel.sourceforge.net) is an open-source software for reliable indel detection based on the microassembly technique. It has been successfully used to discover mutations in novel candidate genes for autism, and it is extensively used in other large-scale studies of human diseases. This protocol gives an overview of the algorithm and describes how to use Scalpel to perform highly accurate indel calling from whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing data. We provide detailed instructions for an exemplary family-based de novo study, but we also characterize the other two supported modes of operation: single-sample and somatic analysis. Indel normalization, visualization and annotation of the mutations are also illustrated. Using a standard server, indel discovery and characterization in the exonic regions of the example sequencing data can be completed in ∼5 h after read mapping.

Indexed as

INDEL MutationAllelesDNA Mutational AnalysisGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMolecular Sequence AnnotationPolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID27854363
PMCPMC5507611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.