Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27854209›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neuromuscular diseases2016

Aceneuramic Acid Extended Release Administration Maintains Upper Limb Muscle Strength in a 48-week Study of Subjects with GNE Myopathy: Results from a Phase 2, Randomized, Controlled Study.

Zohar Argov, Yoseph Caraco, Heather Lau, Alan Pestronk, Perry B Shieh, Alison Skrinar, Tony Koutsoukos, Ruhi Ahmed, Julia Martinisi, Emil Kakkis

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neuromuscular diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Safety and efficacy of aceneuramic acid in GNE myopathy: open-label extension study.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Recent advances onSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Rationale and Design for a Phase 1 Study ofKidney international reports · 2019
    Article
  19. Neurology. Genetics · 2019
    Article
  20. GNE Myopathy: Etiology, Diagnosis, and Therapeutic Challenges.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Zohar ArgovHadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Yoseph CaracoHadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Heather LauNew York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Alan PestronkWashington University Medical Center, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Perry B ShiehUniversity of California Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Alison SkrinarUltragenyx Pharmaceutical, Novato, CA, USA.
Tony KoutsoukosUltragenyx Pharmaceutical, Novato, CA, USA.
Ruhi AhmedUltragenyx Pharmaceutical, Novato, CA, USA.
Julia MartinisiUltragenyx Pharmaceutical, Novato, CA, USA.
Emil KakkisUltragenyx Pharmaceutical, Novato, CA, USA.
Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical (United States) · USHadassah Medical Center · ILNew York University · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USWashington University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGNE Myopathy (GNEM) is a progressive adult-onset myopathy likely caused by deficiency of sialic acid (SA) biosynthesis.

objectiveEvaluate the safety and efficacy of SA (delivered by aceneuramic acid extended-release [Ace-ER]) as treatment for GNEM.

methodsA Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating Ace-ER 3 g/day or 6 g/day versus placebo was conducted in GNEM subjects (n = 47). After the first 24 weeks, placebo subjects crossed over to 3 g/day or 6 g/day for 24 additional weeks (dose pre-assigned during initial randomization). Assessments included serum SA, muscle strength by dynamometry, functional assessments, clinician- and patient-reported outcomes, and safety.

resultsDose-dependent increases in serum SA levels were observed. Supplementation with Ace-ER resulted in maintenance of muscle strength in an upper extremity composite (UEC) score at 6 g/day compared with placebo at Week 24 (LS mean difference +2.33 kg, p = 0.040), and larger in a pre-specified subgroup able to walk ≥200 m at Screening (+3.10 kg, p = 0.040). After cross-over, a combined 6 g/day group showed significantly better UEC strength than a combined 3 g/day group (+3.46 kg, p = 0.0031). A similar dose-dependent response was demonstrated within the lower extremity composite score, but was not significant (+1.06 kg, p = 0.61). The GNEM-Functional Activity Scale demonstrated a trend improvement in UE function and mobility in a combined 6 g/day group compared with a combined 3 g/day group. Patients receiving Ace-ER tablets had predominantly mild-to-moderate AEs and no serious adverse events.

conclusionsThis is the first clinical study to provide evidence that supplementation with SA delivered by Ace-ER may stabilize muscle strength in individuals with GNEM and initiating treatment earlier in the disease course may lead to better outcomes.

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CareAdolescentAdultDistal MyopathiesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedN-Acetylneuraminic AcidYoung AdultN-Acetylneuraminic Aciddistal myopathy with rimmed vacuolesGNE Myopathyhereditary inclusion body myopathymyopathy therapySialic acid

Identifiers

PMID27854209
PMCPMC5271423
OpenAlexW2273721533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.