Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27854156›Full record

ArticlemAbs2017

Demonstration of physicochemical and functional similarity between the proposed biosimilar adalimumab MSB11022 and Humira®.

Laurent Magnenat, Angelo Palmese, Christèle Fremaux, Fabio D'Amici, Mariagrazia Terlizzese, Mara Rossi, Laurent Chevalet

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mAbs, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Biosimilarity and Interchangeability: Principles and Evidence: A Systematic Review.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Laurent Magnenata Non clinical Pharmacology, Merck Biosimilars , Aubonne , Switzerland.
Angelo Palmeseb Department of Protein Chemistry , Merck, Guidonia Montecelio - Rome , Italy.
Christèle Fremauxc Non clinical Pharmacology, Merck Biosimilars , Corsier-sur-Vevey , Switzerland.
Fabio D'Amicid Bioanalytical Development, Pharmaceutical & Analytical Development Biotech Products, Merck, Guidonia Montecelio - Rome , Italy.
Mariagrazia Terlizzesed Bioanalytical Development, Pharmaceutical & Analytical Development Biotech Products, Merck, Guidonia Montecelio - Rome , Italy.
Mara Rossib Department of Protein Chemistry , Merck, Guidonia Montecelio - Rome , Italy.
Laurent Chevalete Analytical and Pharmaceutical Development, Merck Biosimilars , Aubonne , Switzerland.
Merck Serono (Switzerland) · CHMerck Serono (Italy) · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biosimilars are biological products that are highly similar to existing products approved by health authorities. Demonstration of similarity starts with the comprehensive analysis of the reference product and its proposed biosimilar at the physicochemical and functional levels. Here, we report the results of a comparative analysis of a proposed biosimilar adalimumab MSB11022 and its reference product, Humira®. Three batches of MSB11022 and up to 23 batches of Humira® were analyzed by a set of state-of-the-art orthogonal methods. Primary and higher order structure analysis included N/C-terminal modifications, molecular weight of heavy and light chains, C-terminal lysine truncation, disulfide bridges, secondary and tertiary structures, and thermal stability. Purity ranged from 98.4%-98.8% for MSB11022 batches (N = 3) and from 98.4%-99.6% for Humira® batches (N = 19). Isoform analysis showed 5 isoform clusters within the pI range of 7.94-9.14 and 100% glycan site occupancy for both MSB11022 and Humira®. Functional analysis included Fab-dependent inhibition of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-induced cytotoxicity in L929-A9 cell line and affinity to soluble and transmembrane forms of TNF, as well as Fc-dependent binding to Fcγ and neonatal Fc receptors and C1q complement proteins. All tested physicochemical and functional parameters demonstrated high similarity of MSB11022 and Humira®, with lower variability between MSB11022 and Humira® batches compared with variability within individual batches of Humira®. Based on these results, MSB11022 is anticipated to have safety and efficacy comparable to those of Humira®.

Indexed as

AdalimumabAnimalsAntirheumatic AgentsBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsHumansAdalimumabAntirheumatic AgentsBiosimilar Pharmaceuticalsadalimumabanalytical similaritybiosimilarsFcRHumira®MSB11022TNF

Identifiers

PMID27854156
PMCPMC5240642
OpenAlexW2551295995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.