Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27853982›Full record

ArticleJournal of religion and health2017

Spiritual Care Therapy on Quality of Life in Cancer Patients and Their Caregivers: A Prospective Non-randomized Single-Cohort Study.

A Sankhe, K Dalal, V Agarwal, P Sarve

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of religion and health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The role of spirituality in improving psychosocial well-being in women with breast cancer: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Interventions to support spirituality among adults with cancer: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Supportive care interventions for cancer patients in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs): a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Evaluation of Quality of Life and Health Care Needs in Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A SankheClinical Research, BhaktiVedanta Hospital and Research Institute, Srishti Complex, Mira Road, Thane, Mumbai, 401107, Maharashtra, India.
K DalalClinical Research, BhaktiVedanta Hospital and Research Institute, Srishti Complex, Mira Road, Thane, Mumbai, 401107, Maharashtra, India. kisoridd@gmail.com.
V AgarwalClinical Research, BhaktiVedanta Hospital and Research Institute, Srishti Complex, Mira Road, Thane, Mumbai, 401107, Maharashtra, India.
P SarveClinical Research, BhaktiVedanta Hospital and Research Institute, Srishti Complex, Mira Road, Thane, Mumbai, 401107, Maharashtra, India.
Bhaktivedanta Hospital & Research Institute · INSrishti Institute of Art Design and Technology · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spiritual care is still in infancy stage all over the globe including India. The present study was an original study evaluating the role of spiritual care in cancer patients and their primary caregivers regarding their spiritual and general well-being. The study was a prospective, non-randomized single-group study involving cancer patients undergoing surgery and their primary caregivers. Functional assessment of cancer therapy-general and functional assessment of chronic illness therapy-spiritual care was evaluated during the admission and at the time of discharge, two, four  and 6 months following discharge from the hospital. Descriptive statistics was used for demographic details and repeated measure ANOVA with Dunn's test was used for analysis of changes in the scores. A total of 107 (63 males and 44 females) patients with a mean (SD) of age 51 (13) years were recruited in the study. Similarly, for each patient one of their primary caregivers was recruited with their mean (SD) age of 39.4 (12.7) years. A total of 11/107 (10.3%) patients died and nine out of 107 (8.4%) were lost to follow-up eventually during the study period. There was a statistically significant (P < 0.0001) increase in the scores at all the follow-up periods in both the patient and their relative groups. To conclude, we found out that spiritual care on the basis of MATCH guideline improved the level of not only spiritual well-being but general well-being also in both the patients and their primary caregivers. Control group could have improved scientific validity of study in accessing effect of spiritual care. Authors believe that more robust comparative study on each principle against all five MATCH principles in future will add scientific validity and clear the various ambiguities in spiritual care.

Indexed as

SpiritualityAdultAttitude to HealthCaregiversCohort StudiesFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsProspective StudiesQuality of LifeSpiritual TherapiesSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeOncologyPalliative careSpiritual care

Identifiers

PMID27853982
PMCPMC5320005
OpenAlexW2550508883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.