Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27853751›Full record

ArticleNPJ breast cancer2016

Quantitative MRI radiomics in the prediction of molecular classifications of breast cancer subtypes in the TCGA/TCIA data set.

Hui Li, Yitan Zhu, Elizabeth S Burnside, Erich Huang, Karen Drukker, Katherine A Hoadley, Cheng Fan, Suzanne D Conzen, Margarita Zuley, Jose M Net and 6 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ breast cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 214 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
214citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
31.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05466760 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Use of PET/MR Radiomics to Evaluate the Clinical Phenotypes, Response Status of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Long-term Prognosis of Breast Cancer: a Preliminary Study

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorTaipei Veterans General Hospital, TaiwanRan2018 to 2022Enrolled120ConditionsBreast CancerArmsPET/MR
NCT07587086 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Use of Imaging Markers by Fluorocholine PET/MR to Predict Molecular Subtypes and Clinical Outcomes of Breast Cancer: A Pilot Study

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorTaipei Veterans General Hospital, TaiwanRan2022 to 2028Enrolled195ConditionsBreast Neoplasms, FemaleArmsPET-MRI (PET/MR)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

214 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 355 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. TCGA-TCIA Impact on Radiogenomics Cancer Research: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Monitoring Pharmacological Treatment of Breast Cancer with MRI.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Review
  20. Review

154 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Hui LiDepartment of Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Yitan ZhuProgram of Computational Genomics & Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, USA.
Elizabeth S BurnsideDepartment of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Erich HuangNational Cancer Institute, Cancer Imaging Program, Bethesda, MA, USA.
Karen DrukkerDepartment of Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Katherine A HoadleyDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Cheng FanDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Suzanne D ConzenDepartment of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Margarita ZuleyDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Jose M NetDepartment of Radiology, University of Miami Health System, Miami, FL, USA.
Elizabeth SuttonDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Gary J WhitmanDepartment of Radiology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Elizabeth MorrisDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Charles M PerouDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Yuan JiProgram of Computational Genomics & Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, USA; Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Maryellen L GigerDepartment of Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
University of Chicago · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USChicago Department of Public Health · USNational Cancer Institute · USNorthShore University HealthSystem · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Miami Health System · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Elisa de Stanchina · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Virology Research Program (Program 4)P30CA016086 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI David Darr · 1985 to 2026
$201.5M
UW COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER SUPPORTP30CA014520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Nihal Ahmad · 1985 to 2026
$142.6M
Tissue Procurement & PathologyP50CA058223 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CHARLES M PEROU · 1992 to 2026
$59.3M
Gene Expression Patterns in Human Tumors Identified Using Transcript SequencingU24CA143848 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HAYES, DAVID N, PEROU, CHARLES M · 2009 to 2016
$20.8M
TrainingU54AI117924 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CRAVEN, MARK W. · 2014 to 2018
$11.3M
Quantitative Image Analysis for Assessing Response to Breast Cancer TherapyU01CA195564 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI GIGER, MARYELLEN L. · 2015 to 2019
$2.5M
Bayesian models for cancer prognosis by integrating diverse types of dataR01CA132897 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI JI, YUAN, MUELLER, PETER · 2008 to 2019
$2.1M
Machine Learning for Improved Mammography ScreeningR01CA127379 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BURNSIDE, ELIZABETH S · 2007 to 2010
$1.4M
Mentoring And Research In Patient-Oriented Breast Cancer DiagnosisK24CA194251 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BURNSIDE, ELIZABETH S · 2015 to 2019
$963k
NCI NIH HHS K24 CA194251NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014520NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016086NCI NIH HHS P50 CA058223NCI NIH HHS R01 CA127379NCI NIH HHS R01 CA132897NCI NIH HHS U01 CA195564NCI NIH HHS U24 CA143848NIAID NIH HHS U54 AI117924
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using quantitative radiomics, we demonstrate that computer-extracted magnetic resonance (MR) image-based tumor phenotypes can be predictive of the molecular classification of invasive breast cancers. Radiomics analysis was performed on 91 MRIs of biopsy-proven invasive breast cancers from National Cancer Institute's multi-institutional TCGA/TCIA. Immunohistochemistry molecular classification was performed including estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, and for 84 cases, the molecular subtype (normal-like, luminal A, luminal B, HER2-enriched, and basal-like). Computerized quantitative image analysis included: three-dimensional lesion segmentation, phenotype extraction, and leave-one-case-out cross validation involving stepwise feature selection and linear discriminant analysis. The performance of the classifier model for molecular subtyping was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analysis. The computer-extracted tumor phenotypes were able to distinguish between molecular prognostic indicators; area under the ROC curve values of 0.89, 0.69, 0.65, and 0.67 in the tasks of distinguishing between ER+ versus ER-, PR+ versus PR-, HER2+ versus HER2-, and triple-negative versus others, respectively. Statistically significant associations between tumor phenotypes and receptor status were observed. More aggressive cancers are likely to be larger in size with more heterogeneity in their contrast enhancement. Even after controlling for tumor size, a statistically significant trend was observed within each size group (

Identifiers

PMID27853751
PMCPMC5108580
OpenAlexW2549173848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.