ArticleWorld journal of plastic surgery2016
The Satisfaction Rate among Patients and Surgeons after Periareolar Surgical Approach to Gynecomastia along with Liposuction.
Article in World journal of plastic surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Incidence of Complications for Different Approaches in Gynecomastia Correction: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2022Pooled it
- Liposuction Assisted Gynecomastia Surgery With Minimal Periareolar Incision: a Systematic Review.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2022Pooled it
- Key Points of Endoscopic Minimally Invasive Surgery for Gynecomastia Based on Refined Anatomy: A Case Series.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- Ten-Year Single-Center Experience in the Surgical Management of Gynecomastia: Comparative Outcomes of Four Techniques.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- Innovative Surgical Concept for Simon's Grade IIb Gynecomastia: A Systematic Integration of Circumareolar Mastectomy, Interlocking Suture, Inframammary Fold Detachment, and Waterjet-Assisted Liposuction for Superior Long-term Outcomes.Aesthetic surgery journal · 2025Article
- Cross-chest liposuction plus gland resection through single minimal incision for management of grade I/II gynecomastia.BMC surgery · 2025Article
- Efficacy comparison of subcutaneous mastectomy using gasless and gas-insufflation single-port transaxillary approaches for gynecomastia.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Gynecomastia Surgery in 4996 Male Patients Over 14 Years: A Retrospective Analysis of Surgical Trends, Predictive Risk Factors, and Short-Term Outcomes.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2024Article
- Liposuction versus Periareolar Excision Approach for Gynecomastia Treatment.Advanced biomedical research · 2023Article
- Aesthetic Outcome of Gynecomastia Management with Conventional Liposuction and Cross-Chest Liposuction: A Prospective Comparative Study.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2022Article
- Male Gynecomastia Correction by Superior Dynamic Flap Method: A Consistent and Versatile Technique.World journal of plastic surgery · 2020Article
- Article
- Prevalence of Gynaecomastia in Male Pakistani Population.World journal of plastic surgery · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSurgery, as the main approach in higher stages of gynecomastia, has different techniques regarding the staging of the disease. The more the grade of gynecomastia, the more complicated the used surgical techniques, conventionally. This study assessed the success rate of the simplest surgical technique in higher grades of gynecology as well as the satisfaction rate in patients and surgeon to offer using the technique for higher grades of the disease.
methodsTo evaluate the success and the satisfaction rates of periareolar incision and liposuction among patients with grade II and III gynecomastia, this cross-sectional study was conducted.
resultsThe satisfaction rate was the main concern of the present study. The patients had a mean satisfaction score of 8.1±1.396 with the range of 5-10 from total 10 score. The majority of the patients expressed their satisfaction by 9 score. The total mean of physician satisfaction score was 8.36 at all levels.
conclusionLike aesthetic reasons which lead individuals to seek solutions for their annoying gynecomastia, aesthetic satisfaction is a prominent concern for people who undergo surgical approach. So, the least surgical scar and complications are absolutely the most area of focus in this regard.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27853693PMC5109391What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.