Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27853681›Full record

ArticleAnesthesiology and pain medicine2016

Sedative and Analgesic Effects of Propofol-Fentanyl Versus Propofol-Ketamine During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial.

Fakhroddin Bahrami Gorji, Parviz Amri, Javad Shokri, Hakimeh Alereza, Ali Bijani

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anesthesiology and pain medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04029831 (Comparing the Effect of Different Ratio of Propofol-Ketamine Mixture), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04029831 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Comparing the Effect of Different Ratio of Propofol-Ketamine Mixture (Ketofol) (6:1 vs. 4:1) for Sedation in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)

TypeinterventionalSponsorIndonesia UniversityRan2017 to 2017Enrolled58ConditionsAnalgesiaArmsPropofol and Ketamine Mixture (Ketofol)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. A comparison of ventilation with a non-invasive ventilator versus standard OJournal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2020
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Ketamine with Propofol for Endoscopic Procedures.Korean journal of anesthesiology · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fakhroddin Bahrami GorjiStudent Committee Research, The Clinical Research Development Unit of Roohani Hospital, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.
Parviz AmriDepartment of Intensive Care, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.
Javad ShokriDepartment of Gastroenterology, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.
Hakimeh AlerezaVice Chancellor, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.
Ali BijaniSocial Determinants of Health Research Center, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.
Babol University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a painful procedure that requires analgesia and sedation.

objectivesIn this study, we compared the analgesic and sedative effects of propofol-ketamine versus propofol-fentanyl in patients undergoing ERCP.

methodsIn this clinical trial, 72 patients, aged 30 - 70 years old, who were candidates for ERCP were randomly divided into two groups. Before the start of ERCP, both groups received midazolam 0.5 - 1 mg. The intervention group (PK) received ketamine 0.5 mg/kg, and the control group (PF) received fentanyl 50 - 100 micrograms. All patients received propofol 0.5 mg/kg in a loading dose followed by 75 mcg/kg/minute in an infusion. The patients, the anesthesiologist, and the endoscopist were unaware of the medication regimen. Sedation and analgesia quality (based on a VAS), blood pressure, respiratory rate, heart rate, arterial oxygen saturation, recovery time (based on Aldrete scores), and endoscopist and patient satisfation were recorded.

resultsThe sedative effects were equal in the two groups (P > 0.05), but the analgesic effects were higher in the PF group than in the PK group (P < 0.05). The PK group had higher blood pressure levels in the eighth minute. Respiratory rate, heart rate, and arterial oxygen saturation showed no significant differences between the groups (P > 0.05). Endoscopist satisfaction, patient satisfaction, and recovery time showed no significant differences between the two groups (P > 0.05).

conclusionsThe results showed that the sedative effect of propofol-ketamine was equal to the propofol-fentanyl combination during ERCP. To prevent respiratory and hemodynamic complications during ERCP, the propofol-ketamine combination should be used in patients with underlying disease.

Indexed as

AnalgesiaFentanylKetamineMidazolamPropofolSedation

Identifiers

PMID27853681
PMCPMC5106556
OpenAlexW2509984840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.