Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27853630›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of stem cells2016

Current stem cell based therapies in diabetes.

Meredith A Lilly, Meghan F Davis, Josh E Fabie, Elizabeth B Terhune, G Ian Gallicano

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of stem cells, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Automation, Monitoring, and Standardization of Cell Product Manufacturing.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Bioscience reports · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Discovery of a stem-like multipotent cell fate.American journal of stem cells · 2018
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Meredith A LillyGeorgetown University School of Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center Washington D.C., USA.
Meghan F DavisGeorgetown University School of Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center Washington D.C., USA.
Josh E FabieGeorgetown University School of Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center Washington D.C., USA.
Elizabeth B TerhuneGeorgetown University School of Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center Washington D.C., USA.
G Ian GallicanoDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular and Cellular Biology, Georgetown University Medical Center Washington D.C., USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetes is a disease with wide-ranging personal and societal impacts that has been managed medicinally for over half a century. Since the discovery of stem cells, pancreatic islet regeneration has become a central target for clinical application that has the potential to decrease or eliminate the need for insulin administration and adjunctive medications. The discovery of alternative routes to pluripotency that bypass the ethical implications of embryonic stem cells has significantly expanded the horizons of stem cell based therapy. Engraftment of mature insulin producing cells derived from induced pluripotent stem cells may represent the most promising treatment strategy for diabetic patients with impaired β-cell function. These cells are easily accessible and have been shown to closely mimic endogenous β-cell function

Indexed as

diabetes mellitusembryonic stem cellsgermline stem cellsinduced pluripotent stem cellsmesenchymal stem cellsStem cellsstem cell therapy

Identifiers

PMID27853630
PMCPMC5107653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.