Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27853622›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2016

Tool bending in New Caledonian crows.

Christian Rutz, Shoko Sugasawa, Jessica E M van der Wal, Barbara C Klump, James J H St Clair

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Chimpanzees (PeerJ · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christian RutzCentre for Biological Diversity, School of Biology , University of St Andrews , St Andrews KY16 9TH , UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5187-7417
Shoko SugasawaCentre for Biological Diversity, School of Biology , University of St Andrews , St Andrews KY16 9TH , UK.
Jessica E M van der WalCentre for Biological Diversity, School of Biology , University of St Andrews , St Andrews KY16 9TH , UK.
Barbara C KlumpCentre for Biological Diversity, School of Biology , University of St Andrews , St Andrews KY16 9TH , UK.
James J H St ClairCentre for Biological Diversity, School of Biology , University of St Andrews , St Andrews KY16 9TH , UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/G023913/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

'Betty' the New Caledonian crow astonished the world when she 'spontaneously' bent straight pieces of garden wire into hooked foraging tools. Recent field experiments have revealed that tool bending is part of the species' natural behavioural repertoire, providing important context for interpreting Betty's iconic wire-bending feat. More generally, this discovery provides a compelling illustration of how natural history observations can inform laboratory-based research into the cognitive capacities of non-human animals.

Indexed as

comparative cognitionCorvus moneduloidesinnovationinsightintelligencetool use

Identifiers

PMID27853622
PMCPMC5108972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.