Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27853539›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2016

Foot pressure distributions during walking in African elephants (

Olga Panagiotopoulou, Todd C Pataky, Madeleine Day, Michael C Hensman, Sean Hensman, John R Hutchinson, Christofer J Clemente

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Obesity Prevalence and Associated Factors in Captive Asian Elephants (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Farm vehicles approaching weights of sauropods exceed safe mechanical limits for soil functioning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. How moles walk; it's all thumbs.Biology letters · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Olga PanagiotopoulouMoving Morphology and Functional Mechanics Laboratory, School of Biomedical Sciences , The University of Queensland , Brisbane , Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6457-448X
Todd C PatakyInstitute for Fiber Engineering, Department of Bioengineering , Shinshu University , Ueda , Japan.
Madeleine DayMoving Morphology and Functional Mechanics Laboratory, School of Biomedical Sciences , The University of Queensland , Brisbane , Australia.
Michael C HensmanAdventures with Elephants , PO Box 1500, Bela Bela 0480, Limpopo , South Africa.
Sean HensmanAdventures with Elephants , PO Box 1500, Bela Bela 0480, Limpopo , South Africa.
John R HutchinsonStructure and Motion Laboratory, Department of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, The Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, UK; Moving Morphology and Functional Mechanics Laboratory, School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Christofer J ClementeSchool of Science and Engineering , The University of Sunshine Coast , Australia.
The University of Queensland · AURoyal Veterinary College · GBShinshu University · JPUniversity of the Sunshine Coast · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Elephants, the largest living land mammals, have evolved a specialized foot morphology to help reduce locomotor pressures while supporting their large body mass. Peak pressures that could cause tissue damage are mitigated passively by the anatomy of elephants' feet, yet this mechanism does not seem to work well for some captive animals. This study tests how foot pressures vary among African and Asian elephants from habitats where natural substrates predominate but where foot care protocols differ. Variations in pressure patterns might be related to differences in husbandry, including but not limited to trimming and the substrates that elephants typically stand and move on. Both species' samples exhibited the highest concentration of peak pressures on the lateral digits of their feet (which tend to develop more disease in elephants) and lower pressures around the heel. The trajectories of the foot's centre of pressure were also similar, confirming that when walking at similar speeds, both species load their feet laterally at impact and then shift their weight medially throughout the step until toe-off. Overall, we found evidence of variations in foot pressure patterns that might be attributable to husbandry and other causes, deserving further examination using broader, more comparable samples.

Indexed as

biomechanicscentre of pressureelephant feetlocomotionProboscideawelfare

Identifiers

PMID27853539
PMCPMC5098964
OpenAlexW2529299785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.