ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2016
Antifungal
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Uncovering the Antifungal Potential of Plant-Associated Cultivable Bacteria from the Aral Sea Region against Phytopathogenic Fungi.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Polyenic Antibiotics and Other Antifungal Compounds Produced by HemolyticInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Persistence of ecologically similar fungi in a restricted floral niche.Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · 2022Article
- Lobophorin Producing EndophyticFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Unraveling the tripartite interaction of volatile compounds ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Cold Acclimation inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Antifungal Activity and Biosynthetic Potential of NewInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Polyene-ProducingFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Bacterial Quorum-Sensing Molecules as Promising Natural Inhibitors ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021Article
- Plant Natural Products as Antimicrobials for Control ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Common saprophytic fungi are seldom present in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.