Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27853362›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2016

Comparative analysis of budesonide/formoterol and fluticasone/salmeterol combinations in COPD patients: findings from a real-world analysis in an Italian setting.

Valentina Perrone, Diego Sangiorgi, Stefano Buda, Luca Degli Esposti

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. COPD from an everyday primary care point of view.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Valentina PerroneCliCon S.r.l. Health, Economics and Outcomes Research, Ravenna, Italy.
Diego SangiorgiCliCon S.r.l. Health, Economics and Outcomes Research, Ravenna, Italy.
Stefano BudaCliCon S.r.l. Health, Economics and Outcomes Research, Ravenna, Italy.
Luca Degli EspostiCliCon S.r.l. Health, Economics and Outcomes Research, Ravenna, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe objective of this study was to evaluate the different outcomes associated with the use of budesonide/formoterol compared to fluticasone/salmeterol in fixed combinations in patients with COPD in a "real-world" setting. The outcomes included exacerbation rates and health care costs. PATIENTS AND

methodsAn observational retrospective cohort analysis, based on administrative databases of three local health units, was conducted. Patients with at least one prescription of fixed-dose combination of inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β2-agonists (budesonide/formoterol or fluticasone/salmeterol), at dosages and formulations approved for COPD in Italy, between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2011 (inclusion period), were included. Patients were followed until December 2012, death or end of treatment (follow-up period), whichever occurred first. Patients were included if they were aged ≥40 years and had at least 6 months of follow-up. Propensity score matching was performed to check for confounding effects. Number of hospitalizations for COPD and number of oral corticosteroid and antibiotic prescriptions during follow-up were analyzed using Poisson regression models. The cost analysis was conducted from the perspective of the National Health System.

resultsAfter matching, 4,680 patients were analyzed, of which 50% were males with a mean age of 64±13 years. In the Poisson regression models, the incidence rate ratio for budesonide/formoterol as compared to fluticasone/salmeterol was 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.74-0.96,

conclusionAmong patients with COPD, treatment with a fixed combination of budesonide/formoterol was associated with fewer exacerbations and a lower, but not significant, cost of illness than the treatment with fluticasone/salmeterol. Real-world analyses are requested to ameliorate interventions to address unmet needs, optimizing treatment pathways to improve COPD-related burden and outcomes.

Indexed as

Administrative Claims, HealthcareAdrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsAgedBronchodilator AgentsBudesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug CombinationCost-Benefit AnalysisDatabases, FactualDisease ProgressionDrug CostsFemaleFluticasone-Salmeterol Drug CombinationGlucocorticoidsHumansItalyLungMaleAdrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsBronchodilator AgentsBudesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug CombinationFluticasone-Salmeterol Drug CombinationGlucocorticoidsbudesonide/formoterolCOPDexacerbationsfluticasone/salmeterolinhaled corticosteroidslong-acting β2-agonist

Identifiers

PMID27853362
PMCPMC5104304
OpenAlexW2548350623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.