Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27853320›Full record

Observational studyJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2017

Burnout in the neonatal intensive care unit and its relation to healthcare-associated infections.

D S Tawfik, J B Sexton, P Kan, P J Sharek, C C Nisbet, J Rigdon, H C Lee, J Profit

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Automated oxygen delivery for preterm infants with respiratory dysfunction.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Risk Factors of Nosocomial Infection for Infants in Neonatal Intensive Care Units: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2019
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Infections, accidents and nursing overtime in a neonatal intensive care unit.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2022
    Article
  14. Changing safety culture.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Maternal and neonatal health care worker well-being and patient safety climate amid the COVID-19 pandemic.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

D S TawfikDivision of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine and Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
J B SextonDepartment of Psychiatry, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC, USA.
P KanPerinatal Epidemiology and Health Outcomes Research Unit, Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine and Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
P J SharekCalifornia Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative; Palo Alto, CA, USA.
C C NisbetCalifornia Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative; Palo Alto, CA, USA.
J RigdonQuantitative Sciences Unit, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
H C LeePerinatal Epidemiology and Health Outcomes Research Unit, Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine and Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
J ProfitPerinatal Epidemiology and Health Outcomes Research Unit, Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine and Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Stanford University · USCalifornia Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative · GBDuke University Health System · USPalo Alto University · US

Funding

The WISER StudyR01HD084679 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PROFIT, JOCHEN, SEXTON, JOHN BRYAN · 2015 to 2018
$2.2M
Improving the Safety and Quality of Pediatric Health CareK24HD053771 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI THOMAS, ERIC J · 2009 to 2013
$714k
NICHD NIH HHS K24 HD053771NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD084679
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine burnout prevalence among California neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) and to test the relation between burnout and healthcare-associated infection (HAI) rates in very low birth weight (VLBW) neonates. STUDY

designRetrospective observational study of provider perceptions of burnout from 2073 nurse practitioners, physicians, registered nurses and respiratory therapists, using a validated four-item questionnaire based on the Maslach Burnout Inventory. The relation between burnout and HAI rates among VLBW (<1500 g) neonates from each NICU was evaluated using multi-level logistic regression analysis with patient-level factors as fixed effects.

resultsWe found variable prevalence of burnout across the NICUs surveyed (mean 25.2±10.1%). Healthcare-associated infection rates were 8.3±5.1% during the study period. Highest burnout prevalence was found among nurses, nurse practitioners and respiratory therapists (non-physicians, 28±11% vs 17±19% physicians), day shift workers (30±3% vs 25±4% night shift) and workers with 5 or more years of service (29±2% vs 16±6% in fewer than 3 years group). Overall burnout rates showed no correlation with risk-adjusted rates of HAIs (r=-0.133). Item-level analysis showed positive association between HAIs and perceptions of working too hard (odds ratio 1.15, 95% confidence interval 1.04-1.28). Sensitivity analysis of high-volume NICUs suggested a moderate correlation between burnout prevalence and HAIs (r=0.34).

conclusionBurnout is most prevalent among non-physicians, daytime workers and experienced workers. Perceptions of working too hard associate with increased HAIs in this cohort of VLBW infants, but overall burnout prevalence is not predictive.

Indexed as

Infant, Very Low Birth WeightBurnout, ProfessionalCaliforniaCross InfectionCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalLogistic ModelsMaleRetrospective StudiesShift Work ScheduleSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID27853320
PMCPMC5334140
OpenAlexW2555831899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.