Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27853250›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Labeling and analysis of chicken taste buds using molecular markers in oral epithelial sheets.

Prasangi Rajapaksha, Zhonghou Wang, Nandakumar Venkatesan, Kayvan F Tehrani, Jason Payne, Raymond L Swetenburg, Fuminori Kawabata, Shoji Tabata, Luke J Mortensen, Steven L Stice and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The avian taste system.Frontiers in physiology · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Bitter Taste Perception in Chickens.The journal of poultry science · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Prasangi RajapakshaRegenerative Bioscience Center, Department of Animal and Dairy Science, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Zhonghou WangRegenerative Bioscience Center, Department of Animal and Dairy Science, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Nandakumar VenkatesanRegenerative Bioscience Center, Department of Animal and Dairy Science, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Kayvan F TehraniRegenerative Bioscience Center, Department of Animal and Dairy Science, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Jason PayneDepartment of Poultry Sciences, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Raymond L SwetenburgRegenerative Bioscience Center, Department of Animal and Dairy Science, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Fuminori KawabataLaboratory of Functional Anatomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Shoji TabataLaboratory of Functional Anatomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Luke J MortensenRegenerative Bioscience Center, Department of Animal and Dairy Science, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Steven L SticeRegenerative Bioscience Center, Department of Animal and Dairy Science, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Robert BecksteadDepartment of Poultry Sciences, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Hong-Xiang LiuRegenerative Bioscience Center, Department of Animal and Dairy Science, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.

Funding

Taste organs: formation and regulationR01DC012308 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LIU, HONGXIANG · 2013 to 2017
$1.9M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC012308
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In chickens, the sensory organs for taste are the taste buds in the oral cavity, of which there are ~240-360 in total number as estimated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). There is not an easy way to visualize all taste buds in chickens. Here, we report a highly efficient method for labeling chicken taste buds in oral epithelial sheets using the molecular markers Vimentin and α-Gustducin. Immediate tissue fixation following incubation with sub-epithelially injected proteases enabled us to peel off whole epithelial sheets, leaving the shape and integrity of the tissue intact. In the peeled epithelial sheets, taste buds labeled with antibodies against Vimentin and α-Gustducin were easily identified and counted under a light microscope and many more taste buds, patterned in rosette-like clusters, were found than previously reported with SEM. Broiler-type, female-line males have more taste buds than other groups and continue to increase the number of taste buds over stages after hatch. In addition to ovoid-shaped taste buds, big tube-shaped taste buds were observed in the chicken using 2-photon microscopy. Our protocol for labeling taste buds with molecular markers will factilitate future mechanistic studies on the development of chicken taste buds in association with their feeding behaviors.

Indexed as

ChickensMouth MucosaStaining and LabelingTaste BudsAnimalsAvian ProteinsFemaleMaleTransducinVimentinAvian ProteinsgustducinTransducinVimentin

Identifiers

PMID27853250
PMCPMC5112566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.