Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27853140›Full record

ArticleNature communications2016

Spatially precise visual gain control mediated by a cholinergic circuit in the midbrain attention network.

Ali Asadollahi, Eric I Knudsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Synaptic properties of mouse tecto-parabigeminal pathways.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Categorical Signaling of the Strongest Stimulus by an Inhibitory Midbrain Nucleus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Gain control in the sensorimotor system.Current opinion in physiology · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ali AsadollahiDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7915-6846
Eric I KnudsenDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA.

Funding

Cholinergic control of spatial attention: cellular and circuit mechanismsR01EY024243 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KNUDSEN, ERIC · 2014 to 2017
$1.3M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY024243
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A primary function of the midbrain stimulus selection network is to compute the highest-priority location for attention and gaze. Here we report the contribution of a specific cholinergic circuit to this computation. We functionally disconnected the tegmental cholinergic nucleus isthmi pars parvocellularis (Ipc) from the optic tectum (OT) in barn owls by reversibly blocking excitatory transmission in the Ipc. Focal blockade in the Ipc decreases the gain and spatial discrimination of OT units specifically for the locations represented by the visual receptive fields (VRFs) of the disconnected Ipc units, and causes OT VRFs to shift away from that location. The results demonstrate mechanisms by which this cholinergic circuit controls bottom-up stimulus competition and by which top-down signals can bias this competition, and they establish causal linkages between a particular circuit, gain control and dynamic shifts of VRFs. This circuit may perform the same function in all vertebrate species.

Indexed as

AcetylcholineAcoustic StimulationAnimalsAttentionBrain MappingCholinergic FibersMesencephalonNeuronsOptic Lobe, NonmammalianPhotic StimulationStrigiformesVisual PathwaysVisual PerceptionAcetylcholine

Identifiers

PMID27853140
PMCPMC5118544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.