Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27853139›Full record

ArticleNPJ primary care respiratory medicine2016

'To use or not to use': a qualitative study to evaluate experiences of healthcare providers and patients with the assessment of burden of COPD (ABC) tool.

Annerika H M Slok, Mascha Twellaar, Leslie Jutbo, Daniel Kotz, Niels H Chavannes, Sebastiaan Holverda, Philippe L Salomé, P N Richard Dekhuijzen, Maureen P M H Rutten-van Mölken, Denise Schuiten and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ primary care respiratory medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Annerika H M SlokCAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Department of Family medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Mascha TwellaarCAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Department of Family medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Leslie JutboCAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Department of Family medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Daniel KotzCAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Department of Family medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Niels H ChavannesLeiden University Medical Centre, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Sebastiaan HolverdaLung Foundation Netherlands, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
Philippe L SaloméHuisartsencoöperatie PreventZorg, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
P N Richard DekhuijzenDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases, Radboud University medical centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Maureen P M H Rutten-van MölkenErasmus University Rotterdam, Institute for Health Policy and Management/Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Denise SchuitenPICASSO Care Optimisation Program, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.
Johannes C C M In 't VeenSint Franciscus Vlietland Groep, Department of Pulmonology and SZT Centre of Excellence for Asthma & COPD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Onno C P van SchayckCAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Department of Family medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the management of chronic conditions, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), there is a shift from doctor-driven care to patient-centred integrated care with active involvement of and self-management by the patient. A recently developed tool, the assessment of burden of COPD (ABC) tool, can be used in this transition to facilitate self-management support and shared decision-making. We performed a qualitative study, in which we collected and analysed the data using the methods of conventional content analyses. We performed in-depth interviews consisting of mainly open questions. Fifteen healthcare providers and 21 patients were interviewed who had worked with the ABC tool in daily care. In general, participants responded positively to the tool. Healthcare providers felt the visual representation provided was effective and comprehensible for patients and provided them with insight into their disease, a finding that patients confirmed. If patients were allowed to choose between a consultation with or without the ABC tool, the majority would prefer using the tool: it provides them with an overview and insight, which makes it easier to discuss all relevant topics related to COPD. The tool can provide structure in consultations, and is compatible with the concepts of 'motivational interviewing' and 'individualised care-planning'. Suggestions for improvement related to content and layout. So far, the tool has only been available as a stand-alone online program, that is not connected to the electronic medical record systems. It was therefore suggested that the tool be integrated into the systems to enhance its usability and its uptake by healthcare providers.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelAttitude to HealthCost of IllnessAdultAgedFemaleGeneral PractitionersHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotivational InterviewingNursesPatient Care PlanningPatient-Centered CarePulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructivePulmonologists

Identifiers

PMID27853139
PMCPMC5113148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.