Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27853130›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2016

Health-Related Quality-of-Life and Functional Outcomes in Short-Stem Versus Standard-Stem Total Hip Arthroplasty: An 18-Month Follow-Up Cohort Study.

Brandon Michael Henry, Waldemar Wrażeń, Leif Hynnekleiv, Michał Kłosiński, Przemysław A Pękała, Ewa Kucharska, Edward B Golec, Krzysztof A Tomaszewski, Maria Pąchalska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Comparison of short-stem versus conventional stem for hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 60 years: 7-14 years follow-up.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A Novel Fast Mobile-Window Small Incision Technique for Hip Arthroplasty in the Elderly and Comparison with Conventional Incision.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Brandon Michael HenryDepartment of Anatomy, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland.
Waldemar WrażeńDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, 5th Military Clinical Hospital in Cracow, Cracow, Poland.
Leif HynnekleivDepartment of Anatomy, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland.
Michał KłosińskiDepartment of Anatomy, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland.
Przemysław A PękałaDepartment of Anatomy, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland.
Ewa KucharskaDepartment of Gerontology, Geriatrics and Social Work, Ignatianum Academy, Cracow, Poland.
Edward B GolecDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, 5th Military Clinical Hospital in Cracow, Cracow, Poland.
Krzysztof A TomaszewskiDepartment of Anatomy, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland.
Maria PąchalskaDepartment of Neuropsychology, Andrzej Frycz-Modrzewski Cracow University, Cracow, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Osteoarthritis (OA) progressively produces symptoms and disability that may significantly reduce health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an important treatment for symptomatic OA. An alternative to standard-stem THA for younger patients is short-stem THA. The aim of this study was to investigate potential HRQoL and functional outcome differences between these patient groups to provide additional data that will be clinically useful in the decision making between the types of prosthesis. MATERIAL AND METHODS In an 18-month follow-up longitudinal cohort study, we conducted Harris Hip Score (HHS) evaluations and SF-36 questionnaires in a study group and a control group undergoing short-stem and standard-stem THA preoperatively and during follow-up at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months. Effect size was calculated to estimate the size of changes in scores during follow-up between chosen time intervals. RESULTS A total of 168 patients were included in the study. The total HHS score was significantly increased postoperatively from 46.9 to 87.0 in the standard-stem group, and from 42.7 to 85.1 in the short-stem group. All SF-36 scores improved after THA in both groups. No HRQoL or functional differences were found in the use of either surgical option in the HHS or SF-36 score results (all p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS As there were no differences in HRQoL in the two groups, we strongly recommend considering short-stem THA, especially in younger patients, due to the benefit of future revision options and a minimally invasive approach.

Indexed as

AdultArthroplasty, Replacement, HipCase-Control StudiesCohort StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, HipQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID27853130
PMCPMC5123780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.