ReviewThe Korean journal of parasitology2016
Temporal and Spatial Distribution of
Review in The Korean journal of parasitology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enterobiasis and its risk factors in urban, rural and indigenous children of subtropical Argentina.Parasitology · 2022Review
- Intestinal helminths as a biomolecular complex in archaeological research.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020Article
- Confusing a Pollen Grain with a Parasite Egg: an Appraisal of "Paleoparasitological Evidence of Pinworm (Enterobius Vermicularis) Infection in a Female Adolescent Residing in Ancient Tehran".The Korean journal of parasitology · 2019Article
- Pinworm Infection at Salmon Ruins and Aztec Ruins: Relation to Pueblo III Regional Violence.The Korean journal of parasitology · 2019Article
- The Diagnosis and Treatment of Pinworm Infection.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2019Article
- Recovering parasites from mummies and coprolites: an epidemiological approach.Parasites & vectors · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Investigations of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.