Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27852770›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2016

Environmental Anchoring of Head Direction in a Computational Model of Retrosplenial Cortex.

Andrej Bicanski, Neil Burgess

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Ecological Visual Processing in the Mouse.Annual review of neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. [A head direction cell model based on a spiking neural network with landmark-free calibration].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Intrinsic Bipolar Head-Direction Cells in the Medial Entorhinal Cortex.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Symmetries and asymmetries in the neural encoding of 3D space.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andrej BicanskiInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London WC1N 3AZ, United Kingdom, and a.bicanski@ucl.ac.uk n.burgess@ucl.ac.uk.
Neil BurgessInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London WC1N 3AZ, United Kingdom, and a.bicanski@ucl.ac.uk n.burgess@ucl.ac.uk.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 202805/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Allocentric (world-centered) spatial codes driven by path integration accumulate error unless reset by environmental sensory inputs that are necessarily egocentric (body-centered). Previous models of the head direction system avoided the necessary transformation between egocentric and allocentric reference frames by placing visual cues at infinity. Here we present a model of head direction coding that copes with exclusively proximal cues by making use of a conjunctive representation of head direction and location in retrosplenial cortex. Egocentric landmark bearing of proximal cues, which changes with location, is mapped onto this retrosplenial representation. The model avoids distortions due to parallax, which occur in simple models when a single proximal cue card is used, and can also accommodate multiple cues, suggesting how it can generalize to arbitrary sensory environments. It provides a functional account of the anatomical distribution of head direction cells along Papez' circuit, of place-by-direction coding in retrosplenial cortex, the anatomical connection from the anterior thalamic nuclei to retrosplenial cortex, and the involvement of retrosplenial cortex in navigation. In addition to parallax correction, the same mechanism allows for continuity of head direction coding between connected environments, and shows how a head direction representation can be stabilized by a single within arena cue. We also make predictions for drift during exploration of a new environment, the effects of hippocampal lesions on retrosplenial cells, and on head direction coding in differently shaped environments. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The activity of head direction cells signals the direction of an animal's head relative to landmarks in the world. Although driven by internal estimates of head movements, head direction cells must be kept aligned to the external world by sensory inputs, which arrive in the reference frame of the sensory receptors. We present a computational model, which proposes that sensory inputs are correctly associated to head directions by virtue of a conjunctive representation of place and head directions in the retrosplenial cortex. The model allows for a stable head direction signal, even when the sensory input from nearby cues changes dramatically whenever the animal moves to a different location, and enables stable representations of head direction across connected environments.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAnimalsCerebral CortexComputer SimulationEcosystemFeedback, SensoryHeadHead MovementsHumansOrientationSpace PerceptionSpatial BehaviorSpatial Navigationattractor networkshead direction cellsPapez’ circuitparallaxplace cellsretrosplenial cortex

Identifiers

PMID27852770
PMCPMC5125222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.