Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27852762›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2016

Transcriptomic analysis of instinctive and learned reward-related behaviors in honey bees.

Nicholas L Naeger, Gene E Robinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Deep evolutionary conservation of autism-related genes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nicholas L NaegerDepartment of Entomology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Gene E RobinsonDepartment of Entomology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA generobi@illinois.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4828-4068
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

Johnny Bee Good: Bees as Models to Study the Hijacking of the Reward SystemDP1OD006416 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI ROBINSON, GENE E · 2009 to 2011
$2.4M
NIH HHS DP1 OD006416
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We used transcriptomics to compare instinctive and learned, reward-based honey bee behaviors with similar spatio-temporal components: mating flights by males (drones) and time-trained foraging flights by females (workers), respectively. Genome-wide gene expression profiling via RNA sequencing was performed on the mushroom bodies, a region of the brain known for multi-modal sensory integration and responsive to various types of reward. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) associated with the onset of mating (623 genes) were enriched for the gene ontology (GO) categories of Transcription, Unfolded Protein Binding, Post-embryonic Development, and Neuron Differentiation. DEGs associated with the onset of foraging (473) were enriched for Lipid Transport, Regulation of Programmed Cell Death, and Actin Cytoskeleton Organization. These results demonstrate that there are fundamental molecular differences between similar instinctive and learned behaviors. In addition, there were 166 genes with strong similarities in expression across the two behaviors - a statistically significant overlap in gene expression, also seen in Weighted Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis. This finding indicates that similar instinctive and learned behaviors also share common molecular architecture. This common set of DEGs was enriched for Regulation of RNA Metabolic Process, Transcription Factor Activity, and Response to Ecdysone. These findings provide a starting point for better understanding the relationship between instincts and learned behaviors. In addition, because bees collect food for their colony rather than for themselves, these results also support the idea that altruistic behavior relies, in part, on elements of brain reward systems associated with selfish behavior.

Indexed as

InstinctRewardAnimalsBeesBehavior, AnimalFemaleFlight, AnimalGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationGene Regulatory NetworksGenomicsLearningMaleMushroom BodiesPrincipal Component AnalysisSex CharacteristicsBrainGene expressionMushroom bodiesNeuroethologySocial insects

Identifiers

PMID27852762
PMCPMC5117197
OpenAlexW2551659985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.