Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27852729›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2017

Functional role of airflow-sensing hairs on the bat wing.

S J Sterbing-D'Angelo, M Chadha, K L Marshall, C F Moss

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
16.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Ventral wing hairs provide tactile feedback for aerial prey capture in the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

S J Sterbing-D'AngeloInstitute for Systems Research, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland; ssterbi1@JHU.edu.
M ChadhaProgram in Neuroscience and Cognitive Science, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.
K L MarshallDepartments of Dermatology and Physiology and Cellular Biophysics, Columbia University, New York, New York.
C F MossInstitute for Systems Research, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.
Johns Hopkins University · USColumbia University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The wing membrane of the big brown bat (Eptesicus fuscus) is covered by a sparse grid of microscopic hairs. We showed previously that various tactile receptors (e.g., lanceolate endings and Merkel cell neurite complexes) are associated with wing-hair follicles. Furthermore, we found that depilation of these hairs decreased the maneuverability of bats in flight. In the present study, we investigated whether somatosensory signals arising from the hairs carry information about airflow parameters. Neural responses to calibrated air puffs on the wing were recorded from primary somatosensory cortex of E. fuscus Single units showed sparse, phasic, and consistently timed spikes that were insensitive to air-puff duration and magnitude. The neurons discriminated airflow from different directions, and a majority responded with highest firing rates to reverse airflow from the trailing toward the leading edge of the dorsal wing. Reverse airflow, caused by vortices, occurs commonly in slowly flying bats. Hence, the present findings suggest that cortical neurons are specialized to monitor reverse airflow, indicating laminar airflow disruption (vorticity) that potentially destabilizes flight and leads to stall. NEW & NOTEWORTHY: Bat wings are adaptive airfoils that enable demanding flight maneuvers. The bat wing is sparsely covered with sensory hairs, and wing-hair removal results in reduced flight maneuverability. Here, we report for the first time single-neuron responses recorded from primary somatosensory cortex to airflow stimulation that varied in amplitude, duration, and direction. The neurons show high sensitivity to the directionality of airflow and might act as stall detectors.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsChiropteraFlight, AnimalHairMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningPhysical StimulationSensory Receptor CellsSomatosensory CortexTouchTouch PerceptionWings, Animalbatelectrophysiologysomatosensory cortextactile sensingwing

Identifiers

PMID27852729
PMCPMC5292329
OpenAlexW2557163612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.