Trial reportBMJ open2016
High-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity steady-state training in UK cardiac rehabilitation programmes (HIIT or MISS UK): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation.
Trial report in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) Versus Moderate Intensity Steady State Training (MISS) in UK Cardiac Rehabilitation Programmes: a Multi-centre Randomised Controlled Trial and Economic Evaluation
The Effects of Low-Volume High Intensity Interval Training and Circuit Training on Maximal Oxygen Uptake
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of high-intensity interval training on cardiopulmonary function and quality of life in patients with myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Examining Clinical Practice Guidelines for Exercise and Physical Activity as Part of Rehabilitation for People with Stroke: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Pooled it
- High-Intensity Interval Training for Patients With Cardiovascular Disease-Is It Safe? A Systematic Review.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2018Pooled it
- Is exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis to re-examine the evidence.BMJ open · 2018Pooled it
- An open-label, clinical feasibility study of the efficacy of Remdesivir for Long-COVID.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2026Article
- Participant lived experiences of high-intensity interval training in UK cardiac rehabilitation (HIIT or MISS UK): A qualitative study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Liraglutide combined with HIIT preserves contractile apparatus and blunts the progression of heart failure in diabetic cardiomyopathy rats.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Comparison of the acute effects of Tai chi versus high-intensity interval training on inhibitory control in individuals with substance use disorder.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Benefits of a Supervised Ambulatory Outpatient Program in a Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Unit Prior to a Heart Transplant: A Case Study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Article
- An "Exercise" in Cardiac Metabolism.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCurrent international guidelines for cardiac rehabilitation (CR) advocate moderate-intensity exercise training (MISS, moderate-intensity steady state). This recommendation predates significant advances in medical therapy for coronary heart disease (CHD) and may not be the most appropriate strategy for the 'modern' patient with CHD. High-intensity interval training (HIIT) appears to be a safe and effective alternative, resulting in greater improvements in peak oxygen uptake (VO METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This pragmatic study will randomly allocate 510 patients with CHD to 8 weeks of twice weekly HIIT or MISS training at 3 centres in the UK. HIIT will consist of 10 high-intensity (85-90% peak power output (PPO)) and 10 low-intensity (20-25% PPO) intervals, each lasting 1 min. MISS training will follow usual care recommendations, adhering to currently accepted UK guidelines (ie, >20 min continuous exercise at 40-70% heart rate reserve). Outcome measures will be assessed at baseline, 8 weeks and 12 months. The primary outcome for the trial will be change in VO ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol V.1.0, dated 1 February 2016, was approved by the NHS Health Research Authority, East Midlands-Leicester South Research Ethics Committee (16/EM/0079). Recruitment will start in August 2016 and will be completed in June 2018. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals, presented at national and international scientific meetings and are expected to inform future national guidelines for exercise training in UK CR. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02784873; pre-results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.