ArticleBMJ open2016
Prevalence of chemopreventive agent use among hospitalised women at high risk for breast cancer: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- The symptom burden of women with a known risk of breast cancer receiving risk reducing medication.Cancer treatment and research communications · 2025Article
- The Gail Model and Its Use in Preventive Screening: A Comparison of the Corbelli Study.Cureus · 2024Article
- Use and Applicability of the Gail Model to Calculate Breast Cancer Risk: A Scoping Review.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2022Article
- Assessment of breast cancer risk among Iraqi women in 2019.BMC women's health · 2021Article
- Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Using the Gail Model and It’s Predictors in Saudi WomenAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2017Article
- Assessing Breast Cancer Risk Estimates Based on the Gail Model and Its Predictors in Qatari Women.Journal of primary care & community health · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo characterise the current usage of chemoprevention agents among hospitalised women who are at higher risk for breast cancer. STUDY
designA cross-sectional study.
settingAcademic hospital at Baltimore.
participantsA bedside survey of 250 women aged 50-75 years was conducted who were cancer-free at the time of study enrolment and hospitalised to a general medicine service. Reproductive history, family history for breast cancer, chemopreventive agents use and medical comorbidities data was collected for all patients. χ PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of women at high risk for developing breast cancer (5-year Gail risk score ≥1.7) and their chemopreventive agent use.
resultsMean age for the study population was 61.5 years (SD 7.5), and mean 5-year Gail risk score was 1.67 (SD 0.88). A third of study population was at high risk for breast cancer. None of the high-risk women (0%) were taking chemoprevention for breast cancer risk reduction, and 23% were at very high risk with 5-year Gail score ≥3%. These women were not recognised as being high risk by their hospital providers and none were referred to the high-risk breast cancer clinics following discharge.
conclusionsMany hospitalised women are at high risk for breast cancer and we could not identify even a single woman who was using chemoprevention for risk reduction. Current chemoprevention guidelines may be falling short in their dissemination and implementation. Since women at high risk for breast cancer may only interface with the healthcare system at select points, all healthcare providers must be willing and able to do risk assessment. For those identified to be at high risk, providers must then either engage in chemopreventive counselling or refer patients to providers who are more comfortable working with patients on this critical decision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.